WIP: Csharp torque3d work

[lukaspj]

No description provided.

[dottools]

Why are you changing AFX fields? They're not normal properties as for most of them each time they're changed it's pushing the field referenced datablock value to a dynamic array to queue up multiple identical elements of the same type. Hence why they're prefixed with add to indicate it's adding an additional element to the respective effect/action type.

[lukaspj]

I realize that there is a reason they are pre-fixed.
The issue is that there is already a method called "addEffect":

Torque3D/Engine/source/afx/ce/afxPhraseEffect.cpp

Line 300 in c131084

DefineEngineMethod( afxPhraseEffectData, addEffect, void, ( afxEffectBaseData* effectData ),,

Torque3D/Engine/source/afx/ce/afxPhraseEffect.cpp

Line 186 in c131084

addFieldV("addEffect", TYPEID< afxEffectBaseData >(), myOffset(dummy_fx_entry), &emptyValidator,

Which one of these do I get if I do %obj.addEffect ?
Personally I believe these fields are a weird sort of ugly magic and I don't agree with it. But if they have to exist, they should be named something else. I don't really care what, but it shouldn't overlap with the method.

[Azaezel]

based on a review of the docs and samples, would say keep the varname, change the method to push

[lukaspj]

Closed in favor of #2366
Because I changed branch.