Skip to content

spec doc draft additions #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
nickleali wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

spec doc draft additions #4

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 12 additions & 0 deletions spec-rev/modifications.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -67,6 +67,16 @@ Confusion over configuration, the “deployment and execution conditions”. Nee
Net addition:
+ Ephemeral systems that may not always be accessible and do not persist between creation and removal.

#### User Interaction

Remove mention of CSRF, based on our FAQ, from Passive.

https://www.first.org/cvss/v4.0/faq#How-is-the-User-Interaction-metric-used-in-relation-to-CSRF-vulnerabilities

##### Desired change

- or CSRF

#### Privileges Required

As written, assigning PR:High should rarely if ever result in privilege delta and CIA impacts. We need to clarify what is PR:H, without calling this admin.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -97,6 +107,8 @@ https://www.cve.org/resourcessupport/allresources/cnarules#section_4-1_Vulnerabi

##### General

Privilege delta and the determination of changes and gain.

For generative AI / LLM systems, the data within the system versus outputs of the system. Is our stance still correct with regards to CVSS? Do any descriptions in the spec doc need to change?

##### Desired change
Expand Down
Loading