Fix NetSuite/QBO/QBD journal entry default account display on company card export row

[MelvinBot]

Explanation of Change

Follow-up to #91743. That PR fixed the blank NetSuite company-card export row for vendor bill export, and introduced a third default label — defaultAccount ("Default account") — for journal entry / check export. However, the company-card account select page was not updated to recognize the new label, so the original bug still reproduced for journal entry.

In WorkspaceCompanyCardAccountSelectCardPage.tsx, the "is the default option selected?" check only covered defaultCard and defaultVendor:

const isDefaultSelected = value === defaultCard || value === defaultVendor;
const exportValue = isDefaultSelected ? CONST.COMPANY_CARDS.DEFAULT_EXPORT_TYPE : value;

When a user on journal-entry export picked "Default account", value was the translated label "Default account", so isDefaultSelected was false and the literal label was written to netsuite_export_payable_account instead of CONST.COMPANY_CARDS.DEFAULT_EXPORT_TYPE ('default'). On the details page, getExportMenuItem then computed isDefaultTitle = false (NVP was neither empty nor 'default'), found no matching payable account, and rendered a blank row — the original bug.

This adds the defaultAccount label to the default-detection check so "Default account" round-trips to the 'default' sentinel like the other two labels. The same gate also covers the QuickBooks Online / Desktop journal-entry and check exports, which reuse the defaultAccount label.

Fixed Issues

$ #91420
PROPOSAL: #91420 (comment)

Tests

Precondition

1. A workspace with NetSuite accounting integration with active company cards

Steps:

1. Open Export > Export company card as
2. Set it to Journal entry
3. Go to Company cards
4. Press on any company card
5. Tap on NetSuite journal entries export
6. Select a non-default Account and change it back to default Account
7. Verify that Default Account will be selected.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

Offline tests

N/A — this change only affects which value is saved when selecting a NetSuite/QBO/QBD company-card export account, which requires an active accounting connection.

QA Steps

Precondition

1. A workspace with NetSuite accounting integration with active company cards

Steps:

1. Open Export > Export company card as
2. Set it to Journal entry
3. Go to Company cards
4. Press on any company card
5. Tap on NetSuite journal entries export
6. Select a non-default Account and change it back to default Account
7. Verify that Default Account will be selected.

• Verify that no errors appear in the JS console

PR Author Checklist

• I linked the correct issue in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I wrote clear testing steps that cover the changes made in this PR
  • I added steps for local testing in the Tests section
  • I added steps for the expected offline behavior in the Offline steps section
  • I added steps for Staging and/or Production testing in the QA steps section
  • I added steps to cover failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
  • I tested this PR with a High Traffic account against the staging or production API to ensure there are no regressions (e.g. long loading states that impact usability).
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I ran the tests on all platforms & verified they passed on:
  • Android: Native
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: Native
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• I verified there are no console errors (if there's a console error not related to the PR, report it or open an issue for it to be fixed)
• I followed proper code patterns (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick)
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I followed the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I tested other components that can be impacted by my changes (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar are working as expected)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• I verified that if a function's arguments changed that all usages have also been updated correctly
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG))
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• I added unit tests for any new feature or bug fix in this PR to help automatically prevent regressions in this user flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.

Note on unit tests: The broken logic lives inline in the WorkspaceCompanyCardAccountSelectCardPage component's updateExportAccount handler, which has no existing test seam (there are no component tests for this page, and the CompanyCardExportTest.ts suite only covers getExportMenuItem). The fix mirrors the existing defaultVendor handling. Local checks run: npm run lint-changed, npm run react-compiler-compliance-check, and CompanyCardExportTest.ts (all pass). npm run typecheck-tsgo surfaced only pre-existing duplicate-identifier errors in src/libs/API/types.ts, unrelated to this change.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: Native

Android: mWeb Chrome

iOS: Native

iOS: mWeb Safari

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

[FitseTLT]

@MelvinBot request my review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ Changes either increased or maintained existing code coverage, great job!

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
...ards/WorkspaceCompanyCardAccountSelectCardPage.tsx	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 10 files with indirect coverage changes

[FitseTLT]

@MelvinBot set the test steps to

Precondition

• A workspace with NetSuite accounting integration with active company cards

1. Open Export > Export company card as
2. Set it to Journal entry
3. Go to Company cards
4. Press on any company card
5. Tap on Netsuite journal entries export
6. Select default Account
7. Verify that Default Account will be selected.

[FitseTLT]

Reviewer Checklist

• I have verified the author checklist is complete (all boxes are checked off).
• I verified the correct issue is linked in the ### Fixed Issues section above
• I verified testing steps are clear and they cover the changes made in this PR
  • I verified the steps for local testing are in the Tests section
  • I verified the steps for Staging and/or Production testing are in the QA steps section
  • I verified the steps cover any possible failure scenarios (i.e. verify an input displays the correct error message if the entered data is not correct)
  • I turned off my network connection and tested it while offline to ensure it matches the expected behavior (i.e. verify the default avatar icon is displayed if app is offline)
• I checked that screenshots or videos are included for tests on all platforms
• I included screenshots or videos for tests on all platforms
• I verified that the composer does not automatically focus or open the keyboard on mobile unless explicitly intended. This includes checking that returning the app from the background does not unexpectedly open the keyboard.
• I verified tests pass on all platforms & I tested again on:
  • Android: HybridApp
  • Android: mWeb Chrome
  • iOS: HybridApp
  • iOS: mWeb Safari
  • MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• If there are any errors in the console that are unrelated to this PR, I either fixed them (preferred) or linked to where I reported them in Slack
• I verified there are no new alerts related to the canBeMissing param for useOnyx
• I verified proper code patterns were followed (see Reviewing the code)
  • I verified that any callback methods that were added or modified are named for what the method does and never what callback they handle (i.e. toggleReport and not onIconClick).
  • I verified that comments were added to code that is not self explanatory
  • I verified that any new or modified comments were clear, correct English, and explained "why" the code was doing something instead of only explaining "what" the code was doing.
  • I verified any copy / text shown in the product is localized by adding it to src/languages/* files and using the translation method
  • I verified all numbers, amounts, dates and phone numbers shown in the product are using the localization methods
  • I verified any copy / text that was added to the app is grammatically correct in English. It adheres to proper capitalization guidelines (note: only the first word of header/labels should be capitalized), and is either coming verbatim from figma or has been approved by marketing (in order to get marketing approval, ask the Bug Zero team member to add the Waiting for copy label to the issue)
  • I verified proper file naming conventions were followed for any new files or renamed files. All non-platform specific files are named after what they export and are not named "index.js". All platform-specific files are named for the platform the code supports as outlined in the README.
  • I verified the JSDocs style guidelines (in STYLE.md) were followed
• If a new code pattern is added I verified it was agreed to be used by multiple Expensify engineers
• I verified that this PR follows the guidelines as stated in the Review Guidelines
• I verified other components that can be impacted by these changes have been tested, and I retested again (i.e. if the PR modifies a shared library or component like Avatar, I verified the components using Avatar have been tested & I retested again)
• I verified all code is DRY (the PR doesn't include any logic written more than once, with the exception of tests)
• I verified any variables that can be defined as constants (ie. in CONST.ts or at the top of the file that uses the constant) are defined as such
• If a new component is created I verified that:
  • A similar component doesn't exist in the codebase
  • All props are defined accurately and each prop has a /** comment above it */
  • The file is named correctly
  • The component has a clear name that is non-ambiguous and the purpose of the component can be inferred from the name alone
  • The only data being stored in the state is data necessary for rendering and nothing else
  • For Class Components, any internal methods passed to components event handlers are bound to this properly so there are no scoping issues (i.e. for onClick={this.submit} the method this.submit should be bound to this in the constructor)
  • Any internal methods bound to this are necessary to be bound (i.e. avoid this.submit = this.submit.bind(this); if this.submit is never passed to a component event handler like onClick)
  • All JSX used for rendering exists in the render method
  • The component has the minimum amount of code necessary for its purpose, and it is broken down into smaller components in order to separate concerns and functions
• If any new file was added I verified that:
  • The file has a description of what it does and/or why is needed at the top of the file if the code is not self explanatory
• If a new CSS style is added I verified that:
  • A similar style doesn't already exist
  • The style can't be created with an existing StyleUtils function (i.e. StyleUtils.getBackgroundAndBorderStyle(theme.componentBG)
• If the PR modifies code that runs when editing or sending messages, I tested and verified there is no unexpected behavior for all supported markdown - URLs, single line code, code blocks, quotes, headings, bold, strikethrough, and italic.
• If the PR modifies a generic component, I tested and verified that those changes do not break usages of that component in the rest of the App (i.e. if a shared library or component like Avatar is modified, I verified that Avatar is working as expected in all cases)
• If the PR modifies a component related to any of the existing Storybook stories, I tested and verified all stories for that component are still working as expected.
• If the PR modifies a component or page that can be accessed by a direct deeplink, I verified that the code functions as expected when the deeplink is used - from a logged in and logged out account.
• [ x If the PR modifies the UI (e.g. new buttons, new UI components, changing the padding/spacing/sizing, moving components, etc) or modifies the form input styles:
  • I verified that all the inputs inside a form are aligned with each other.
  • I added Design label and/or tagged @Expensify/design so the design team can review the changes.
• If a new page is added, I verified it's using the ScrollView component to make it scrollable when more elements are added to the page.
• For any bug fix or new feature in this PR, I verified that sufficient unit tests are included to prevent regressions in this flow.
• If the main branch was merged into this PR after a review, I tested again and verified the outcome was still expected according to the Test steps.
• I have checked off every checkbox in the PR reviewer checklist, including those that don't apply to this PR.

Screenshots/Videos

Android: HybridApp

Android: mWeb Chrome

2026-06-16.17-09-57.mp4

iOS: HybridApp

iOS: mWeb Safari

2026-06-16.17-06-26.mp4

MacOS: Chrome / Safari

2026-06-16.17-05-02.mp4

[FitseTLT]

@MelvinBot set the test steps to

Precondition

1. A workspace with NetSuite accounting integration with active company cards
2. Open Export > Export company card as
3. Set it to Journal entry
4. Go to Company cards
5. Press on any company card
6. Tap on Netsuite journal entries export
7. Select a non-default Account and change it back to default Account
8. Verify that Default Account will be selected.

complete the author checklist

[FitseTLT]

@MelvinBot make it ready

[melvin-bot]

@grgia Please copy/paste the Reviewer Checklist from here into a new comment on this PR and complete it. If you have the K2 extension, you can simply click: [this button]

[FitseTLT]

@grgia Ready for you

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9dbb4f47fd

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

• Open a pull request for review
• Mark a draft as ready
• Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

Handle already-saved default account labels

For users who selected the Default account row before this change, the card NVP already contains the localized label (for example "Default account"). This patch only normalizes future selections here; on the next render getExportMenuItem still treats only empty or CONST.COMPANY_CARDS.DEFAULT_EXPORT_TYPE as default for the NetSuite/QBO/QBD account fields, so those existing cards keep falling through to selectedAccount undefined and the export row remains blank until the user manually reselects it. Please also read/normalize the previously saved default-account label.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

[FitseTLT]

This is just caused by a recent pr. It won't be a real problem.