spl: ffi: catch panics in FFI layer to prevent caller crashes#48685
spl: ffi: catch panics in FFI layer to prevent caller crashes#48685
Conversation
Files inventory check summaryFile checks results against ancestor af001651: Results for datadog-agent_7.79.0~devel.git.305.290efe8.pipeline.105291782-1_amd64.deb:No change detected |
Static quality checks✅ Please find below the results from static quality gates 30 successful checks with minimal change (< 2 KiB)
On-wire sizes (compressed)
|
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsMetrics dashboard Baseline: af00165 Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected
|
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -2.61 | [-5.56, +0.34] | 1 | Logs |
Fine details of change detection per experiment
| perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ➖ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory utilization | +0.53 | [+0.28, +0.77] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulativetodelta_exporter | memory utilization | +0.44 | [+0.22, +0.67] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | +0.41 | [+0.36, +0.46] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_logs | memory utilization | +0.34 | [+0.25, +0.44] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_20mb_12k_contexts_20_senders | memory utilization | +0.15 | [+0.09, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.06 | [-0.09, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.05 | [-0.38, +0.47] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.04 | [-0.44, +0.53] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_logs | memory utilization | +0.02 | [-0.04, +0.09] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.19, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_v3 | ingress throughput | +0.01 | [-0.19, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.07, +0.08] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics | memory utilization | -0.01 | [-0.19, +0.18] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.40, +0.38] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | -0.02 | [-0.08, +0.04] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_delta | memory utilization | -0.15 | [-0.32, +0.02] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | ddot_metrics_sum_cumulative | memory utilization | -0.18 | [-0.33, -0.04] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | -0.24 | [-0.28, -0.21] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | otlp_ingest_metrics | memory utilization | -0.30 | [-0.46, -0.14] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | docker_containers_memory | memory utilization | -0.77 | [-0.84, -0.70] | 1 | Logs |
| ➖ | quality_gate_logs | % cpu utilization | -1.63 | [-3.24, -0.02] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
| ➖ | docker_containers_cpu | % cpu utilization | -2.61 | [-5.56, +0.34] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed
| perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed | observed_value | links |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ✅ | docker_containers_cpu | simple_check_run | 10/10 | 547 ≥ 26 | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | memory_usage | 10/10 | 273.32MiB ≤ 370MiB | |
| ✅ | docker_containers_memory | simple_check_run | 10/10 | 704 ≥ 26 | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.18GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.24GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.20GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 | 0.22GiB ≤ 1.20GiB | |
| ✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 = 3 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 | 173.35MiB ≤ 175MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | intake_connections | 10/10 | 3 = 3 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 | 491.59MiB ≤ 550MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 4 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 205.75MiB ≤ 220MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | cpu_usage | 10/10 | 353.31 ≤ 2000 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | intake_connections | 10/10 | 4 ≤ 6 | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | memory_usage | 10/10 | 416.55MiB ≤ 475MiB | bounds checks dashboard |
| ✅ | quality_gate_metrics_logs | missed_bytes | 10/10 | 0B = 0B | bounds checks dashboard |
Explanation
Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%
Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
- ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
- ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
- ➖ = no significant change in performance
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
CI Pass/Fail Decision
✅ Passed. All Quality Gates passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check cpu_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_metrics_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check missed_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_logs, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check intake_connections: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
- quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
What does this PR do?
This PR wraps the logic of the public functions of
liddd_discovery.awithpanic::catch_unwindto prevent crashes on eventual panics.Now, in case the Rust code panics, it will be caught and
dd_discovery_get_serviceswill returnNULLto signal an error occured and allow the caller to react accordingly.Motivation
Prevent panics in Rust from crashing the whole system-probe in the future
Describe how you validated your changes
To verify the
catch_unwindbarrier works at the C FFI boundary, I built a small C program linked againstlibdd_discovery.athat called a temporarydd_test_panic()FFI function (added for this test, then removed) that panics internally inside catch_unwind.Additional Notes