Skip to content

Johnfreeman/issue13 fix dbe ci handling#14

Merged
jcfreeman2 merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
johnfreeman/issue13_fix_dbe_CI_handling
Feb 5, 2026
Merged

Johnfreeman/issue13 fix dbe ci handling#14
jcfreeman2 merged 2 commits intodevelopfrom
johnfreeman/issue13_fix_dbe_CI_handling

Conversation

@jcfreeman2
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

John Freeman added 2 commits February 4, 2026 10:20
…the repo for which the single repo CI workflow is run is dbe, but if _any_ of the repos pulled down for the build are dbe
@jcfreeman2
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR addresses #13.

Note that if you look at the not-to-be-merged PR I set up in ipm, DUNE-DAQ/ipm#118, you can see what this PR does. This morning I created johnfreeman/github_issue13_test branches both for ipm and dbe, and then opened up a PR for the former to actuate a single repo CI workflow. As expected, it failed - that's what this PR is meant to address. By switching over to this branch, the ipm single repo CI workflow succeeded.

@jcfreeman2 jcfreeman2 linked an issue Feb 4, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@andrewmogan
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM. Approved.

@jcfreeman2 jcfreeman2 merged commit d31c59f into develop Feb 5, 2026
@jcfreeman2 jcfreeman2 deleted the johnfreeman/issue13_fix_dbe_CI_handling branch February 5, 2026 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

The single repo CI workflow needs to better handle dbe

2 participants