-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
fix: simplify getBlockSignatureSets api #8720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @twoeths, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request streamlines several signature verification APIs by narrowing their input parameters. Previously, many functions required the comprehensive Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request simplifies the getBlockSignatureSets API and its dependencies by removing the need to pass the entire CachedBeaconStateAllForks object. Instead, only the necessary data, such as currentSyncCommitteeIndexed or the block's slot, is passed down. This is a great refactoring that improves decoupling and makes the function signatures more explicit about their requirements.
The changes are applied consistently across the codebase, and the reasoning for using block.slot instead of state.slot is well-documented in comments. My review includes a few minor suggestions to improve the consistency of these comments.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## unstable #8720 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 52.04% 52.07% +0.02%
============================================
Files 848 848
Lines 65734 64733 -1001
Branches 4807 4771 -36
============================================
- Hits 34214 33707 -507
+ Misses 31451 30957 -494
Partials 69 69 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Motivation
Description
given this
getConfigapi:we currently pass
state.slotas the 1st param. However it's the same toblock.slotinstate-transitionand the same epoch when we verify blocks in batch in beacon-nodeblock.slotinstead of passing the whole CachedBeaconStateAllForks ingetBlockSignatureSets()apicurrentSyncCommitteeIndexedinsteadpart of #8650