-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 427
refactor: move reward apis to state-transition #8719
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: unstable
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @twoeths, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request undertakes a significant refactoring effort to improve the modularity and organization of reward-related logic within the project. It centralizes the definitions of reward types into a dedicated Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request is a well-executed refactoring that moves reward-related APIs and their implementations to the state-transition package, and the corresponding type definitions to the types package. This is a logical change as reward calculations are tightly coupled with state transitions. The changes are clean and consistent across the codebase. I have a couple of minor suggestions to improve maintainability by removing some commented-out code and avoiding code duplication.
| import {sszTypesFor} from "./sszTypes.js"; | ||
| export {sszTypesFor, SSZTypesFor, ssz}; | ||
|
|
||
| export * from "./rewards.js"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These should be somewhat consistent with how other types are exported. Or at least not just dumped in the top-level export.
Motivation
beforeProcessEpoch() processBlock() processAttestationAltair()so it needs to be moved thereDescription
typespackage so that it can be used everywherestate-transitionpackageCloses #8690