Merged
Conversation
jamesrhester
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2026
vaitkus
force-pushed
the
add-iri-type-contents
branch
from
5ebc951 to
289a985
Compare
Collaborator
Author
|
Since we are happy with the proposed definition, I will preemptively add this new content type to the validator and then merge this PR. |
vaitkus
force-pushed
the
add-iri-type-contents
branch
from
289a985 to
29a8099
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes issue #17.
For now, I opted for a more restrictive definition allows only full IRIs and not relative IRIs. Alternatively, we could phrase it in the same way as the URI definition to allow both full and relative IRIs (identifier vs. identifier reference), however, I am unsure if this is currently needed.