build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.3.1 to 6.0.2 - #12
Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 84 commits into
Closed
build(deps): bump actions/checkout from 4.3.1 to 6.0.2#12dependabot[bot] wants to merge 84 commits into
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 84 commits into
Conversation
- Split seed.yaml into 20 individual node files under nodes/[confidence]/ - Moved node.schema.yaml to schema/ - Moved KOS-session-001.md to sessions/session-001.md - Added CLAUDE.md, README.md - Created probes/, findings/, nodes/placeholder/ directories - Removed seed.yaml (superseded by split node files) 12 bedrock, 5 frontier, 3 graveyard nodes
Probe: decomposed 3 ThreeDoors planning documents (executive-summary, product-scope, high-level-architecture) into 12 typed nodes with dependency edges. Surfaced 10 inter-document inconsistencies. Result: PARTIAL. Checksum property confirmed — graph surfaces errors invisible in individual documents. Schema sufficient for decomposition but needs edge types beyond depends_on and temporal state handling. Spawned questions: question-edge-types, question-temporal-state Artifacts: probes/brief-mvg-bootstrap.yaml, probes/mvg-bootstrap-nodes/, findings/finding-001-mvg-bootstrap.yaml
…iathon Finding-002 (penny-orc, 17 nodes, PARTIAL): rs.md critiques drift but project's own PRDs exhibit it. Project knows what's wrong but hasn't integrated the knowledge into practice. Scale paradox: "BMAD doesn't scale" written inside a project that scaled BMAD to 48 planning docs. Finding-003 (axiathon, 14 nodes, CONFIRMS): 6 contradictions, 2 gaps, systematic phase boundary erosion. Architecture's own validation checks coverage but not consistency — declares "ALL GAPS RESOLVED" while contradictions exist at every document seam. Strongest confirmation of the checksum property: graph catches what checklists miss. Cross-probe: three projects, same categories (contradictions, gaps, structural chaos), different shapes. Pattern is stable. Edge-type and temporal-state questions remain open, now informed by three data sets.
…questions B1: annotated three-state confidence under examination (temporal vs epistemic) B5: annotated validation across three projects (findings 001-003) F4: manual bootstrap workflow validated, automated mechanisms still open F5: collaboration model demonstrated, repo-as-context-handoff works Q1: partially answered (checksum property confirmed, schema gaps remain) Q5: added penny-orc data point (intent-execution gaps) Q6-Q7: added edge-types and temporal-state questions Next action: updated to reflect current state
Added section on probe artifacts and finding file naming based on patterns established in session-002 probe work.
Combined probe for question-edge-types and question-temporal-state. Brief committed as continuity marker — if context drops, a new session can find this brief, check for a finding, and know the probe is in progress but incomplete.
Schema revision based on three-project probe data (findings 001-003): - Added edges field with four types: derives, implements, contradicts, supersedes. depends_on retained as backward-compatible shorthand. - Temporal state NOT added as field — handled by contradicts edges (external inconsistencies) and graph topology (KOS lifecycle). - Documented intentional omissions with reopener criteria. Finding-004 confirms hypothesis. Question-edge-types answered. Question-temporal-state deferred with rationale. Charter updated.
Probed 9 open-source projects to test category stability: - Backstage (ADRs+BEPs): confirms, 5 issues, gaps dominate - Crossplane (design docs): confirms, 5 issues, silent abandonment pattern - Kubernetes KEPs: partial, 2 gaps, disciplined process catches most seams - Rust RFCs: partial, 6 issues, sequential evolution not same as contradiction - Go Proposals: partial, 4 seams, 3 already acknowledged by authors - Python PEPs: partial, 3 seams, managed evolution with minor residual gaps - BMAD enterprise: confirms, 3 issues, AI-generated docs show milder seams - OpenHands: confirms, 7 issues, architectural transition creates stale docs - AutoGen: partial, 5 issues, seams within v0.4 worse than v0.2-to-v0.4 12 projects total (3 personal + 9 external). Cross-project synthesis pending.
Schema v0.3: added signal classification on edges (error | evolution | drift). Silent abandonment documented as graph analysis pattern. Twelve-project evidence base. See finding-014. Charter B5 revised: "surfaces signal; classification requires human judgment and declared supersession" replaces "errors become apparent." Charter B7 added: Process Quality Gradient. KOS adds the most value where existing processes are weakest. Kubernetes (2 issues) vs ThreeDoors (10 issues) vs axiathon (11 issues). Consistent across twelve-project sample. Understanding not encoded into schema or charter doesn't survive the session.
Gaps closed: - question-node-schema-validity: updated with session-002 evidence (substantially answered — type enum sufficient, edges validated, one-node-per-file scales) - question-edge-types: annotated as answered, validated across 12 projects - question-temporal-state: annotated as deferred with confidence - brief-broadening-probe: retroactive brief for the 9-project probe (skipped during execution, written to close protocol gap) Process fix: - Added Harvest Verification checklist to CLAUDE.md session protocol. Runs between probe cycles within a session. Checks: frontier questions updated, answered questions annotated, brief exists, charter current. Addresses the drift-at-cycle-boundaries pattern observed in session-002.
Added explicit limitation (manual only, automated detection is a tooling concern) and provenance annotation. Reformatted as action checkboxes. Incorporated external review feedback.
…ed context from repo alone New agent instance read CLAUDE.md + charter + findings, correctly identified project state and prioritized Q4 (code-only bootstrap) without human correction. Confirms F5 repo-as-context-handoff for Claude Code at current repo scale. Conditions documented: model-dependent, scale-dependent, orientation not continuation.
Controlled test: bootstrap axiathon graph from code+git only, ignoring all BMAD/planning docs. Compare against finding-003 ground truth to measure what code-only catches, misses, and uniquely finds.
…ce across cold starts Session-003 agent chose Q4; session-002 reasoning favored Q5. Both defensible. Node exists to track whether this divergence recurs (structural gap) or not (noise).
…lementary signal Q4 probe: bootstrapped axiathon graph from code+git only, compared against finding-003 ground truth (11 doc-based issues). Rediscovered 1 cleanly (parser tech), overlapped 1 (latency claims). Found 4 code-unique issues docs missed (spike divergence, config gap, no binary, planning weight). Key insight: code-only and doc-only probing are complementary lenses, not redundant. Phase boundary erosion (finding-003's strongest signal) is invisible from code. Technology migration paths and philosophy-implementation gaps are invisible from docs. A complete graph needs both. Result: PARTIAL — code-only bootstrap viable, produces signal, but signal class is different. Not a substitute for document probing.
Updated F4 with code-only bootstrap results (complementary signal, not redundant). Updated F5 with cold-start validation (finding-015). Q4 marked partially answered. Next action updated to Q5 (where does this break).
…rpened Finding-016 under-interpreted architectural implications. Added: - B4 (correspondence layer) elevated from planned to structurally necessary - B5 (shadow principle) extended: code is also a lossy projection, not just docs - Q2 (ripple engine) sharpened: must operate across lenses with different signal profiles
Five hypothesized classes of knowledge that may resist node decomposition: tacit expertise, political/organizational, aesthetic judgment, meta-process, negative space. Test against KOS decisions and axiathon decision archaeology.
… pervasive flattening Q5 probe: tested 5 categories of knowledge against node decomposability. Two genuine structural limits: 1. Negative space — graph can't represent what was never considered. Absence of a node is not a node. Logically impossible without meta-artifact. 2. Meta-process patterns — instances decompose, patterns about the graph-building process don't. No natural edges, wrong layer. One pervasive flattening: edges collapse epistemological character. "derives from evidence" and "derives from conviction" use the same edge type. Topology preserved, epistemology lost. Result: CONFIRMS — the graph has describable blind spots.
B1 annotated with known representational limits (negative space, meta-process patterns, epistemological edge flattening). Q5 marked partially answered. Next action updated to reflect both Q4 and Q5 results. Remaining: Q2, Q3, untested Q5 angles.
Design probe, not empirical: propose ripple mechanism, test retrospectively against twelve-project data. Constraints from finding-016 (cross-lens) and finding-017 (epistemological flattening).
Q2 probe: designed dirty-flag propagation with typed attenuation. Retrospective test: 10/11 axiathon issues detectable (conditional on decomposition quality), 2-3 false positives. Key finding: ripple is maintenance (propagate staleness along existing edges), not discovery (find new contradictions). Probes discover. Ripple maintains. Executive loop coordinates both. Noise is false staleness, not false conflicts — manageable via attenuation, supersession firebreaks, and content hashing.
Q2 marked answered: ripple is maintenance not discovery, noise managed by typed attenuation and supersession firebreaks. Q3 sharpened: executive loop coordinates probes (discovery) and ripple (maintenance), convergent dirty flags bridge the two.
…blem Git repos are lossy projections of the knowledge topology, the same way documents are lossy projections of the spec graph. The file presentation layer flattens structure agents could use directly. B3 revised: the requirement is content-addressed immutable facts with crypto integrity and distributed sync — git is one implementation, not the long-term answer. Graveyarded before the limitation manifests. Finding-015 tested the degenerate single-repo case.
…l limit The graph captures declared structure, not the structure of ideas themselves. Pattern recognition across undeclared conceptual relationships requires the human. Session-003 demonstrated this live: agent had all pieces of the recursive projection pattern, human connected them. Subsumes finding-017's five categories under one principle. B6 revised: human role is permanently the pattern recognizer on the graph's blind spot.
Added G5 (git as sufficient substrate) to graveyard section. Updated next action to reflect finding-019 as session's most significant result and full session-003 scope.
…ject validation Q3 probe: designed the executive as an event-driven priority queue with three input channels (ripple, questions, human) and convergence detection. Tested against all twelve projects from the session-002 sample. finding-020: initial mechanism design (placeholder confidence — self-referential test) finding-021: three-project empirical test (ThreeDoors, Kubernetes, OpenHands) finding-022: twelve-project synthesis — mechanism holds, review_gap replaces governance_gap, parallel vs sequential docs need different treatment, synthesis identified as third work type
B7 renamed from "Process Quality Gradient" to "Review Gap Gradient" — the predictor of signal yield is cross-document consistency review, not governance quality or visibility. B6 extended with executive specification. Q3 partially answered: mechanism designed and validated across twelve projects. Three work types: discovery, maintenance, synthesis. Human role refined to meta-epistemologist.
Workspace::discover() and from_explicit() now find repos that have _kos/kos.yaml but aren't under the aae-orc tree. Previously doctor, graphs, orient, etc. all failed outside aae-orc with a misleading "could not locate aae-orc root" error. Standalone repos like ftc now work as first-class kos citizens.
init only wrote kos-commits.md if .claude/rules/ already existed. Now creates the rules/ directory if .claude/ is present. Also adds three frontier questions from session-012: charter scaling past LLM context thresholds, subrepo kos workflow gaps, and standalone repo distribution model.
Bootstrapping two repos exposed: workspace discovery didn't support standalone repos (fixed), init skipped commit rules when .claude/rules/ didn't exist (fixed), and the kos process has no vocabulary for encoding pre-existing knowledge into a new graph. See finding-037.
Per-commit releases from main: build for darwin-arm64, linux-amd64,
linux-arm64. Apple code signing and notarization for macOS. Homebrew
formula at arcavenae/tap/kos. Self-update via `kos update`. Build-time
version injection via build.rs.
New files: build.rs, src/updater.rs, scripts/create-{app,dmg,pkg}.sh,
packaging/Info.plist, Formula/kos.rb. New dep: reqwest (blocking, rustls).
New subcommands: kos update, kos version. justfile: just install.
The build-release gate only allowed push events. Manual re-runs via workflow_dispatch were limited to checks only.
Sole author, no external contributions accepted. Apache-2.0 was set in Cargo.toml without a LICENSE file. Standardize on MIT to match aclaude, ThreeDoors, and tmux-cmc.
Security hardening: all actions pinned to commit SHAs instead of mutable tags, contents:write scoped to release jobs only, and persist-credentials:false on all checkout steps. dtolnay/rust-toolchain steps now include explicit toolchain: parameter for SHA-pinned usage.
… 037-038 Bootstrapped switchboard and ftc with kos. Fixed standalone workspace discovery. Built CI/CD release pipeline with signing, self-update, and Homebrew. Org-wide security hardening across 5 repos. Three frontier questions opened (charter scaling, subrepo workflow, standalone distribution). Charter session log updated.
CI: tag prefix main- → alpha-, channel env main → alpha. build.rs: default channel alpha. Updater: - Channel-aware filtering: only considers alpha-* tagged releases, ignoring any future stable-* or v* releases - Version-specific updates: kos update [VERSION] for upgrade or downgrade. Exact match, partial match (date prefix), or latest. - find_release helper with channel filtering and version matching - fetch_releases factored out for reuse - brew_formula_name() derives formula from binary name (kos vs kos-a) - 7 tests: asset naming, install method, deserialization, channel filtering, exact match, partial match
…side aae-orc Orient now detects standalone repos (root == kos_root) and uses a separate gather_standalone() codepath that reads _kos/ directly: - Charter items shown unfiltered (no target string matching) - Nodes displayed by confidence tier (bedrock, frontier, graveyard) - Probes, ideas, findings from _kos/ subdirectories - Header shows "(standalone)", hint says "add nodes to _kos/nodes/" - JSONL output includes orient_meta with standalone flag Orchestrator/subrepo path completely untouched — zero regression risk. Includes question node (question-orient-gathering-vs-interpreting) and probe brief (brief-orient-standalone) with FAT-1 through FAT-9. Refs: finding-037-bootstrap-seeding-gap F4
…m penny-orc research Extracted knowledge from penny-orc lifecycle composition initiative (lifecycle-improvement-rs.md + 11 linked documents, ~171 sources across 5 research tracks). The lifecycle's eight structural problems map structurally to kos capabilities — kos IS the lifecycle composition engine at the knowledge layer. Bedrock (11): context-ceiling (measured, 5 projects), gate-enforcement (43%→100% xMP), ai-improvisation-past-broken-refs (236 bugs, 25%), fractal-lifecycle (Beer/Ashby, validated through spike lifecycle), drift-propagation-taxonomy (extend/integrate/deprecate/target), conant-ashby-regulator, bidirectional-feedback-underimplemented, seven-channel-protocol, conways-law-modularity (8x factor), double-loop-learning (Argyris), auftragstaktik-intent-specs (Moltke). Graveyard (3): flat-file-context-scaling, single-workflow-type, human-as-integration-bus. Frontier questions (7): fractal-process-ceremony, kos-as-learn-phase, fractal-gates, delivery-finding-channel, spec-quality-dominant-factor, fitness-functions-from-graph, vsm-mapping-to-kos. Ideas (6): universal-bridge-intermediary, cli-maturity-for-external-use, kos-as-lifecycle-knowledge-layer, composable-process-variants, eight-lifecycle-problems-as-kos-roadmap, finding-type-taxonomy. Finding: finding-039-lifecycle-composition-extraction.
…ubstrate convergence Three additions from cross-session reflection: question-intent-under-context-break: how does intent survive context breaks without human as integration bus? Sharpens session-001 Q3 (executive loop) with auftragstaktik mapping and graveyard evidence. The substrate hypothesis meets the lifecycle research here. question-maps-from-edge-type: translation nodes need a directed edge type that encodes vocabulary canonicality. derives is symmetric; maps_from would tell agents which vocabulary to reason in. finding-040-substrate-ceiling-convergence: the three graveyard entries (flat-file, single-workflow, human-as-bus) are three measurements of the same ceiling. kos has outgrown its substrate assumptions. Confirms finding-036 (substrate hypothesis) with measured evidence from the lifecycle research.
…hema v0.3+ Fourth element of the cognitive architecture: the predictor. A continuous forward model running orthogonally to the cycle, generating predictions about graph state, weighting by confidence, updating on surprise. The brief already contains a hypothesis (prediction). The finding records the outcome. The gap between them — prediction error — is the learning signal currently being discarded. Two optional schema fields close it: brief.predicted_confidence: float 0.0-1.0, recorded before probe runs finding.surprise_magnitude: none|low|medium|high|inverted, recorded after No new architecture. The existing brief→finding structure becomes a calibration instrument with one measurement discipline added. Nodes: question-predictor-layer: what is it, how does it run orthogonally? question-brief-as-prediction-record: is the brief already the seed? elem-predictor-layer: the fourth element (frontier, not built) grv-reactive-query-model: query-when-prompted insufficient at scale schema/node.schema.yaml: predicted_confidence + surprise_magnitude
…G6-G9, frontier F6-F9 Bedrock additions: B8 (bidirectional feedback + double-loop learning), B9 (change propagation taxonomy), B10 (Conway's Law 8x modularity). B2 updated with fractal lifecycle evidence from 171-source research. B6 updated with predictor layer as fourth cognitive architecture element and Conant-Ashby good regulator theorem grounding. Graveyard additions: G6 (flat-file context scaling), G7 (single workflow type), G8 (human-as-integration-bus), G9 (reactive query model). Frontier additions: F6 (predictor layer), F7 (fractal process ceremony), F8 (kos as lifecycle knowledge layer), F9 (intent under context break). Session log: session-013 entry with full summary.
… cascade fix Process subcommands (kos idea, question, finding, probe) scaffold artifacts in the correct _kos/ directory based on cwd. Each uses nearest_graph() to resolve orchestrator vs subrepo vs standalone. Finding auto-numbers by scanning existing findings. Probe includes predicted_confidence, finding includes surprise_magnitude. Orient now shows _kos/ graph content (nodes by tier, findings, probes, ideas) in orchestrator and subrepo modes, not just standalone. Fixes #4. Three edge types added: supports, instantiates, partially_resolves. Schema v0.3 and Rust model updated. Fixes #5 (edge types). Validate no longer produces phantom failures after parse errors. Parse-errored nodes are reported once and skipped. Fixes #5 (cascade). Finding model: confidence field now defaults to frontier when omitted, allowing orient to load findings from graphs with varying schemas. Finding-041: charter inflation as empirical evidence of graph gap. Three frontier question nodes updated with session-014 notes. Refs: #3, #4, #5
…ile requirements Surveyed speckit, bmad, chainlink, beads, VSDD, multiclaude, OpenClaudia, gastown, pennyfarthing, spectacle, ThreeDoors, and sideshow. Every system has a unique directory fingerprint (simple existence checks). Three storage paradigms: files-over-git, embedded database, hybrid. Artifact-to-node mapping is consistent across systems despite different formats. Key finding: beads (gastownhall/beads, 20k stars) has solved several problems kos is still asking about — compaction/memory decay, discovered-from edge type, gate/await primitives, ready-work computation. sideshow confirmed as distribution mechanism for bridge profiles. Bundled model preferred: each pack ships its own kos-bridge.yaml. Finding-042. Three ideas: seed-bridge-profiles, beads-as-kos-prior-art, seed-survey-remaining. Probe brief: brief-seed-scan (revised to research- first approach). predicted_confidence: 0.6, surprise_magnitude: medium.
…ding Scans a directory for knowledge artifacts and SDD systems. Two layers: Built-in universal detection: ADRs (5 directory patterns), project docs (README, SOUL, ROADMAP, charter, etc.), CHANGELOG, CLAUDE.md/.claude/, CI/CD workflows, build systems (cargo, go, npm, just, make), docs/ trees, source and test directories, config files, licenses. SDD system fingerprinting: bmad (_bmad/_config/manifest.yaml with version), speckit (.specify/init-options.json with version), chainlink (.chainlink/), beads (.beads/), multiclaude (.multiclaude/), OpenClaudia (.openclaudia/), gastown (.gastown/), pennyfarthing (.pennyfarthing/), spectacle (spectacle.yaml with version), kos (_kos/kos.yaml). ThreeDoors BOARD.md pattern detected as special ADR variant. Git stats: commit count, contributor count, age, branches, default branch. Output: human-readable summary or --json JSONL for agent consumption. Usage: kos seed scan [--json] [--dir <path>]
… substrate Source-code analysis of gastownhall/beads across five areas. Six concrete recommendations for kos: R1: Add discovered-from edge type (low cost, high value — provenance) R2: Add kos orient --ready for ready-work computation (medium cost, high value) R3: Tiered compaction for graveyard nodes (medium cost, future) R4: Gate primitives for probe briefs (low cost, medium value) R5: Keep YAML-over-git, do not adopt Dolt (confirmed) R6: Blocking edge distinction for ready-work (low cost, enables R2) Key insight: beads' compaction uses LLM-powered 2-tier summarization with size guards and snapshot preservation. Ready-work computation uses blocking edge classification + transitive exclusion + hybrid sort policy. Both are adoptable without changing kos's substrate. Finding-043. surprise_magnitude: medium (compaction design more sophisticated than expected, Dolt recommendation clearer than expected).
Signed-off-by: StepSecurity Bot <bot@stepsecurity.io>
…urity-remediation [StepSecurity] Apply security best practices
Bumps [actions/checkout](https://github.com/actions/checkout) from 4.3.1 to 6.0.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/checkout/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/actions/checkout/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](actions/checkout@v4.3.1...de0fac2) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: actions/checkout dependency-version: 6.0.2 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-major ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
added
dependencies
Contributor
Author
|
OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. |
dependabot
Bot
deleted the
dependabot/github_actions/actions/checkout-6.0.2
branch
April 12, 2026 02:47
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps actions/checkout from 4.3.1 to 6.0.2.
Release notes
Sourced from actions/checkout's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from actions/checkout's changelog.
... (truncated)
Commits
de0fac2Fix tag handling: preserve annotations and explicit fetch-tags (#2356)064fe7fAdd orchestration_id to git user-agent when ACTIONS_ORCHESTRATION_ID is set (...8e8c483Clarify v6 README (#2328)033fa0dAdd worktree support for persist-credentials includeIf (#2327)c2d88d3Update all references from v5 and v4 to v6 (#2314)1af3b93update readme/changelog for v6 (#2311)71cf226v6-beta (#2298)069c695Persist creds to a separate file (#2286)ff7abcdUpdate README to include Node.js 24 support details and requirements (#2248)08c6903Prepare v5.0.0 release (#2238)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)