Use translation-ids for user relation types #1857
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
MightyMCoder
approved these changes
Oct 7, 2025
Member
|
I haven't found any issues so I think this is ready to merge. |
Fasse
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 7, 2025
…lation-types Use translation-ids for user relation types
Fasse
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 8, 2025
…lation-types Use translation-ids for user relation types
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When preparing new demo data I thought it would be useful if we support translation-IDs for user relation types. Than we can deliver this for all installations and the user relation types will always be in the language of the user.