Possibility to add new community maintainers

[ryanolee]

Hi @vkkis93 ,
Firstly thanks for making this package! It is currently the best way to emulate step functions offline by a wide margin and has helped a bunch!

What

This package looks to still have a fair few open contributions from community members though the last release for the package was in late 2019 (Nearly 2 years ago). At this stage it seems the the package is edging towards being abandonware.

How we might want to address this.

@vkkis93 would you be open to adding more community maintainers to help out with getting members PRs merged? It seems like there are a fair few community efforts in this region including:
#71
#62
#57
#47
#45
#32
#31

I would be happy to try to help work through this backlog of PRs to get things merged / moving again if you are open to it?
Thanks!

• Ryan

[j0k3r]

Hello @vkkis93,
Have you seen this message?
It could be great if other people can help you improve your library.

[cullylarson]

Use serverless-step-functions-local instead. It has better documentation and works great.