Functions that should be removed from class definition

[andrewdavidsmith]

I think functions like expected zeros should be removed from the class definition. They don't need the private data of the class.

[timydaley]

Are you talking about ZTNB class? Because that uses private parameters of
the class.

On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Andrew Smith notifications@github.com
wrote:

I think functions like expected zeros should be removed from the class
definition. They don't need the private data of the class.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1.

Timothy Daley
University of Southern California

[andrewdavidsmith]

Not from what I see. It seems you just use the accessors, and those are trivial. It seems like no reason to keep the functions within the class. They would not be used by a typical person wanting to use a ZTNB outside of the relatively narrow capture-recapture context.