|
| 1 | +--- |
| 2 | +title: "GSoC '25 Week 8 Update by Elwin Li" |
| 3 | +excerpt: "MusicBlocks generation model" |
| 4 | +category: "DEVELOPER NEWS" |
| 5 | +date: "2025-07-26" |
| 6 | +slug: "2025-07-26-gsoc-25-Elwin-Li-week08" |
| 7 | +author: "@/constants/MarkdownFiles/authors/elwin-li.md" |
| 8 | +tags: "gsoc25,sugarlabs,week8,music generation,RAG" |
| 9 | +image: "assets/Images/GSOC.png" |
| 10 | +--- |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +<!-- markdownlint-disable --> |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +# Week 8 Progress Report by Elwin Li |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +**Project:** MusicBlocks Generation Model |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +**Mentors:** [Walter Bender](https://github.com/walterbender), [Anindya Kundu](https://github.com/meganindya), [Devin Ulibarri](https://github.com/pikurasa) |
| 19 | + |
| 20 | +**Reporting Period:** 2025-07-19 - 2025-07-26 |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +--- |
| 23 | + |
| 24 | +## Goals for This Week |
| 25 | + |
| 26 | +- **Goal:** Generate MIDI from prompt for MusicBlocks generation model |
| 27 | + |
| 28 | +--- |
| 29 | + |
| 30 | +## This Week’s Achievements |
| 31 | + |
| 32 | +Last week, I made the pivot from trying to fine tune a model to building a RAG pipeline. This week, I have completed building a RAG pipeline that takes in a prompt in the form of a song, artist, or music style, and generates a MIDI note sequence in a similar style. |
| 33 | + |
| 34 | +This was done by the following: |
| 35 | +1. **Data Collection & Cleaning**: Found and cleaned a large dataset of MIDI files to use as the foundation for the generation model. |
| 36 | + |
| 37 | +2. **Metadata Extraction**: Extracted important metadata from each MIDI file including: |
| 38 | + - Artist name |
| 39 | + - Song title |
| 40 | + - Musical style/genre |
| 41 | + - BPM (Beats Per Minute) |
| 42 | + - Additional musical characteristics |
| 43 | + This step proved crucial for improving the retrieval accuracy of the RAG pipeline. |
| 44 | + |
| 45 | +3. **Vector Embedding**: Used Langchain to: |
| 46 | + - Create embeddings of the MIDI data and metadata |
| 47 | + - Store the embeddings in a vector database |
| 48 | + This forms the "Retrieval" component of the RAG system. |
| 49 | + |
| 50 | +4. **Similarity Search**: When a user inputs a prompt (e.g., "hotel california"): |
| 51 | + - The system performs a similarity search between the query and vector database |
| 52 | + - Returns either the exact matching song (if present in dataset) |
| 53 | + - Or returns similar songs based on musical characteristics |
| 54 | + |
| 55 | +5. **Generation Pipeline**: Using the retrieved MIDI representation: |
| 56 | + - Leveraged Gemini API with carefully engineered prompts |
| 57 | + - Generated new melodies that maintain similar musical characteristics |
| 58 | + - Output new MIDI files that capture the style of the requested song |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +--- |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +## Challenges & How I Overcame Them |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +- **Challenge:** Realized that the available dataset was too small for effective fine-tuning. |
| 65 | + |
| 66 | + **Solution:** Shifted focus to learning about Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) as an alternative approach. |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +- **Challenge:** Some MIDI files in the dataset had formatting issues and corruption. |
| 69 | + |
| 70 | + **Solution:** Implemented thorough data cleaning and validation: |
| 71 | + - Checked for proper MIDI file structure |
| 72 | + - Removed corrupted or malformed files |
| 73 | + - Validated tempo and time signature information |
| 74 | + - Ensured consistent formatting across the dataset |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | +- **Challenge:** Initial attempts at embedding raw MIDI data resulted in poor retrieval accuracy. |
| 77 | + |
| 78 | + **Solution:** Enhanced the embedding process by: |
| 79 | + - Including rich metadata alongside MIDI data |
| 80 | + - Adding musical characteristics like genre, tempo, and key |
| 81 | + - Incorporating artist and song information |
| 82 | + - This significantly improved the relevance of retrieved results |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +--- |
| 85 | + |
| 86 | +## Key Learnings |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | +- **RAG as an Alternative to Fine-tuning**: Learned that RAG can be an effective approach when dealing with limited training data, as it leverages existing knowledge rather than requiring extensive fine-tuning. |
| 89 | + |
| 90 | +- **Data Quality is Critical**: Discovered the importance of thorough data preprocessing and validation in building robust ML systems. Poor quality data can significantly impact system performance. |
| 91 | + |
| 92 | +- **Embedding Strategy Matters**: Realized that the choice of what information to include in embeddings greatly affects retrieval accuracy. Including rich metadata alongside raw data can substantially improve results. |
| 93 | + |
| 94 | +- **MIDI Data Handling**: Gained practical experience in: |
| 95 | + - Working with MIDI file formats |
| 96 | + - Handling corrupted files |
| 97 | + - Extracting musical characteristics |
| 98 | + |
| 99 | +--- |
| 100 | + |
| 101 | +## Next Week’s Roadmap |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +- Improve Output Quality |
| 104 | +- Documentation & Testing |
| 105 | +- Use gemini embedding model |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +--- |
| 108 | + |
| 109 | +## Acknowledgments |
| 110 | + |
| 111 | +Thank you to my mentors, the Sugar Labs community, and fellow GSoC contributors for ongoing support. |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +--- |
0 commit comments