Replies: 4 comments 5 replies
-
What would be the point of doing so? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This would be a huge breaking change to svelte the language. And not an improvement either, just different. Not happening. Please also try to keep discussions in the kit repo about kit. If you want to discuss about svelte itself, there is https://svelte.dev/chat |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I get the sentiment, but it doesn't really make sense. The whole reason a ton of people adore Svelte is due to its simplicity - this just complicates the syntax and the way you write components. It just makes logical sense that you write a script tag, a style tag then your markup - as that's what each components comprises of. Adding weird syntax to wrap what essentially compiles down to what we're currently writing anyways makes no sense. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Y..? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was thinking in terms of reducing scaffolding in the code, it might be a good idea to change
<script>
and<style>
tags fromto
not sure what complications this could create but it was a thought in my head for a while
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions