Direct Taylor linearisation of the likelihood #33
Closed
SamDuffield
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Ok I figured a workaround by allowing |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'd really like to support a linearisation method that simply uses a 2nd order Taylor expansion in$x$ without touching $y$ .
That is linearizes a more general potential$G(x)$ rather than conditional distribution $p(y \mid x)$ .
This is used in$y$ is categorical.
abilehere https://github.com/SamDuffield/abile/blob/a10fb8c328fdb088fdbafd3f82bb537d89d67bb6/abile/models/extended_kalman.py#L101where it is particularly useful when
The problem is with just the gradient$g = \nabla G(x)$ and Hessian $H = \nabla^2 G(x)$ I don't see how to get it into the $(H, d, L)$ form required for
generalized-kalman.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions