Skip to content

Commit 492e199

Browse files
committed
Formatted and compiled latex files
1 parent 593ba1b commit 492e199

File tree

4 files changed

+43
-21
lines changed

4 files changed

+43
-21
lines changed
-2 Bytes
Binary file not shown.
-3 Bytes
Binary file not shown.
43.5 KB
Binary file not shown.

docs/projMngmnt/Rev0_Team_Contrib.tex

Lines changed: 43 additions & 21 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -24,15 +24,31 @@
2424

2525
\section{Demo Plans}
2626

27-
For our \textbf{Rev 0 demonstration}, we will showcase the core functionality and usability of our \textbf{energy-efficient Python code refactoring tool}. This demonstration will highlight the following key aspects:
27+
For our \textbf{Rev 0 demonstration}, we will showcase the core
28+
functionality and usability of our \textbf{energy-efficient Python
29+
code refactoring tool}. This demonstration will highlight the
30+
following key aspects:
2831

2932
\begin{enumerate}
3033

31-
\item \textbf{Code Smell Detection:} We will demonstrate how our tool identifies inefficient coding patterns (\textit{code smells}) in Python source code that contribute to higher energy consumption.
32-
\item \textbf{Automated Refactoring:} Our tool will apply targeted refactorings to optimize the detected code smells, improving energy efficiency.
33-
\item \textbf{Energy Consumption Measurement:} Using \texttt{CodeCarbon}, we will measure and compare the energy consumption of the original code versus the refactored version, providing clear insights into energy savings.
34-
\item \textbf{Functionality Preservation:} To ensure that optimizations do not alter program behaviour, we will run the original test suite against both the unoptimized and refactored versions.
35-
\item \textbf{VS Code Integration:} We will showcase our \textbf{VS Code plugin}, where users can analyze a Python file for code smells, choose specific optimizations, and preview the refactored code with energy measurements. Users will have the option to accept or reject the proposed changes.
34+
\item \textbf{Code Smell Detection:} We will demonstrate how our
35+
tool identifies inefficient coding patterns (\textit{code
36+
smells}) in Python source code that contribute to higher energy consumption.
37+
\item \textbf{Automated Refactoring:} Our tool will apply targeted
38+
refactorings to optimize the detected code smells, improving
39+
energy efficiency.
40+
\item \textbf{Energy Consumption Measurement:} Using
41+
\texttt{CodeCarbon}, we will measure and compare the energy
42+
consumption of the original code versus the refactored version,
43+
providing clear insights into energy savings.
44+
\item \textbf{Functionality Preservation:} To ensure that
45+
optimizations do not alter program behaviour, we will run the
46+
original test suite against both the unoptimized and refactored versions.
47+
\item \textbf{VS Code Integration:} We will showcase our \textbf{VS
48+
Code plugin}, where users can analyze a Python file for code
49+
smells, choose specific optimizations, and preview the refactored
50+
code with energy measurements. Users will have the option to
51+
accept or reject the proposed changes.
3652

3753
\end{enumerate}
3854

@@ -175,7 +191,10 @@ \section{Commits}
175191
\end{tabular}
176192
\end{table}
177193

178-
The number of commits does not necessarily reflect the amount of work done by each team member. Some members prefer to make frequent small commits while others make fewer but larger commits that include multiple changes.
194+
The number of commits does not necessarily reflect the amount of work
195+
done by each team member. Some members prefer to make frequent small
196+
commits while others make fewer but larger commits that include
197+
multiple changes.
179198

180199
\section{Issue Tracker}
181200

@@ -185,22 +204,25 @@ \section{Issue Tracker}
185204
issues (C only)) over the time period of interest.}
186205

187206
\begin{table}[H]
188-
\centering
189-
\begin{tabular}{lll}
190-
\toprule
191-
\textbf{Student} & \textbf{Authored (O+C)} & \textbf{Assigned (C only)}\\
192-
\midrule
193-
Tanveer Brar & 1 & 47 \\
194-
Mya Hussain & 8 & 51 \\
195-
Ayushi Amin & 8 & 58 \\
196-
Sevhena Walker & 81 & 72 \\
197-
Nivetha Kuruparan & 17 & 53 \\
198-
\bottomrule
199-
\end{tabular}
207+
\centering
208+
\begin{tabular}{lll}
209+
\toprule
210+
\textbf{Student} & \textbf{Authored (O+C)} & \textbf{Assigned (C only)}\\
211+
\midrule
212+
Tanveer Brar & 1 & 47 \\
213+
Mya Hussain & 8 & 51 \\
214+
Ayushi Amin & 8 & 58 \\
215+
Sevhena Walker & 81 & 72 \\
216+
Nivetha Kuruparan & 17 & 53 \\
217+
\bottomrule
218+
\end{tabular}
200219
\end{table}
201220

202-
Counts are considered by taking the total counts over the year and subtracting the counts at the time of the POC Team Contribution. This is the period of intrest.
203-
We did a lot of work over the winter break to exclude that period and only do "this term" would inaccurately represent the counts.
221+
Counts are considered by taking the total counts over the year and
222+
subtracting the counts at the time of the POC Team Contribution. This
223+
is the period of intrest.
224+
We did a lot of work over the winter break to exclude that period and
225+
only do "this term" would inaccurately represent the counts.
204226
\section{CICD}
205227

206228
\wss{Say how CICD is used in your project}

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)