roman [2:18 PM]
Just want to confirm that the scope of "tag KU" is not global.
gleki [2:49 PM]
it's limited to "sentence"
roman [2:49 PM]
okay but so it can't apply to just part of a tanru?
gleki [2:51 PM]
you mean in linkargs? let's revise all cases where "term" can appear.
[2:52]
in
statement-1
| prenex statement
prenex =
terms ZOhU #
the "terms" contains one or more "term" and they have scope over each other and the scope of the first of them must be limited to "statement"
[2:53]
in
[terms [CU #]] bridi-tail
the scope is in "sentence"
[2:54]
in
bridi-tail-1 [gihek [stag] KE # bridi-tail /KEhE#/ tail-terms]
bridi-tail-1 =
bridi-tail-2 [gihek # bridi-tail-2 tail-terms] ...
bridi-tail-2 =
bridi-tail-3 [gihek [stag] BO # bridi-tail-2 tail-terms]
bridi-tail-3 =
selbri tail-terms
| gek-sentence
tail-terms are limited to these rules in scope.
[2:56]
in
gek subsentence gik subsentence tail-terms
| [tag] KE # gek-sentence /KEhE#/
| NA # gek-sentence
the "tail-terms" must be limited to what is after {gik} til the end of the rule.
NA is probably limited to gek-sentence.
new messages
[2:57]
in
the CEhE breaks left-to-right scope of "term"s. So {bai ce'e mau} = {mau ce'e bai}
[2:59]
in
terms-2 [PEhE # joik-jek terms-2] ...
the same happens: the first "terms-2" don't affect the scope of the second "terms-2
roman [2:18 PM]
Just want to confirm that the scope of "tag KU" is not global.
gleki [2:49 PM]
it's limited to "sentence"
roman [2:49 PM]
okay but so it can't apply to just part of a tanru?
gleki [2:51 PM]
you mean in linkargs? let's revise all cases where "term" can appear.
[2:52]
in
the "terms" contains one or more "term" and they have scope over each other and the scope of the first of them must be limited to "statement"
[2:53]
in
the scope is in "sentence"
[2:54]
in
tail-terms are limited to these rules in scope.
[2:56]
in
the "tail-terms" must be limited to what is after {gik} til the end of the rule.
NA is probably limited to gek-sentence.
new messages
[2:57]
in
the CEhE breaks left-to-right scope of "term"s. So {bai ce'e mau} = {mau ce'e bai}
[2:59]
in
the same happens: the first "terms-2" don't affect the scope of the second "terms-2