-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32.2k
reversed is not thread-safe #120608
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
Comments
ambv
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 12, 2025
Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <[email protected]>
seehwan
pushed a commit
to seehwan/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Apr 16, 2025
…hon#120971) Co-authored-by: Sam Gross <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Kumar Aditya <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Łukasz Langa <[email protected]>
hugovk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2025
miss-islington
pushed a commit
to miss-islington/cpython
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2025
(cherry picked from commit b102f09) Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]>
hugovk
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2025
Co-authored-by: Rafael Fontenelle <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Bug report
Bug description:
The
reversed
builtin is not thread safe. The same element from a sequence can be returned multiple times.CPython versions tested on:
CPython main branch
Operating systems tested on:
Windows
Linked PRs
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: