Concatenation of details #143
Udaberrico
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment
-
Are you referring to the Analyser behaviour or does also Interpreter do it in the same way? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello everyone,
I have a problem here, and I don't know if it is the expected behavior or if it's actually not right.
I have a part of a message in the format D99B. According to the documentation, partyName appears several times in succession. These are then combined into one word without a separator.
I have traced the whole thing back to the following PR #133
Is the concatenation the right way? In my example, I get something like
["partyName" => [ "partyName" => "Company Ltd.FirstNameLastname"]]
.Now as this information is quite important because its the name of the invoice receiving company, shouldn't it be something like
["partyName" => [ "partyName" => ["Company Ltd.", "FirstName", "Lastname"]]]
This would make it easier to process it further.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions