You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm sharing a drive with windows. I use pnpm. I haven't noticed any issues, really, but It just occured to me, since ntfs doesen't really have symlinks, will pnpm's whole idea of symlinking the packages from the shared store work properly on an ntfs drive mounted under linux?
Does pnpm have to copy the packages for each project, not saving any disk space?
I'm using whatever the default driver for ntfs is, so i think that's ntfs-3g.
in case it won't work (please explain why & what it's doing instead), i can move my coding folder to an ext4 partition, but i'd rather not.
Thanks!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I'm sharing a drive with windows. I use pnpm. I haven't noticed any issues, really, but It just occured to me, since ntfs doesen't really have symlinks, will pnpm's whole idea of symlinking the packages from the shared store work properly on an ntfs drive mounted under linux?
Does pnpm have to copy the packages for each project, not saving any disk space?
I'm using whatever the default driver for ntfs is, so i think that's ntfs-3g.
in case it won't work (please explain why & what it's doing instead), i can move my coding folder to an ext4 partition, but i'd rather not.
Thanks!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions