-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
OCPBUGS-46121: [4.14] cherry-pick containernetworking/plugins#997 #168
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-46121: [4.14] cherry-pick containernetworking/plugins#997 #168
Conversation
The new `disableContainerInterface` parameter is added to the bridge plugin to enable setting the container interface state down. When the parameter is enabled, the container interface (veth peer that is placed at the container ns) remain down (i.e: disabled). The bridge and host peer interfaces state are not affected by the parameter. Since IPAM logic involve various configurations including waiting for addresses to be realized and setting the interface state UP, the new parameter cannot work with IPAM. In case both IPAM and DisableContainerInterface parameters are set, the bridge plugin will raise an error. Signed-off-by: Or Mergi <[email protected]>
|
@ormergi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46121, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ormergi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46121, which is invalid:
Comment In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@ormergi: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46121, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 7 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
|
/lgtm |
|
/label backport-risk-assessed |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: dougbtv, ormergi The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/label cherry-pick-approved |
|
@ormergi: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
af498ba
into
openshift:release-4.14
|
@ormergi: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46121: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-46121 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-containernetworking-plugins |
Following https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-48109, this PR back ports #155