By default with ZFS pools, duf shows snapshots as FS which it should probably not do. I'd either add a "snapshot" type to the -hide command or just ignore them by default (could maybe even be used by btrfs as well, but I don't know where snaphots work there).
╭──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮
│ 1819 local devices │
├───────────────────┬──────┬─────────┬───────┬───────┬────────┬────────────────┤
│ MOUNTED ON │ SIZE │ USED │ AVAIL │ USE% │ TYPE │ FILESYSTEM │
├───────────────────┼──────┼─────────┼───────┼───────┼────────┼────────────────┤
│ / │ 1.2T │ 1021.2M │ 1.2T │ 0.1% │ zfs │ tank/root │
│ //.zfs/snapshot/2 │ 1.2T │ 378.1M │ 1.2T │ 0.0% │ zfs │ tank/root@2013 │
│ 013071801 │ │ │ │ │ │ 071801 │
│ //.zfs/snapshot/2 │ 1.2T │ 1.1G │ 1.2T │ 0.1% │ zfs │ tank/root@2019 │
│ 0191031 │ │ │ │ │ │ 1031 │
1819 local devices includes all snapshots.
Thanks for duf, I like it :)
By default with ZFS pools,
dufshows snapshots as FS which it should probably not do. I'd either add a "snapshot" type to the-hidecommand or just ignore them by default (could maybe even be used by btrfs as well, but I don't know where snaphots work there).1819 local devices includes all snapshots.
Thanks for duf, I like it :)