Changing messages comments/descriptions affects protocol version

[Roman-]

Here is what protocol version calculator should take into account:

• Msgs IDs and names
• Order of msgs fields and their types
• Fields names (e.g. changing single field name from "uint32 capacity_liters" to "uint32 capacity_ml" must change the hash)

Fields comments and message descriptions must not affect protocol version

[Roman-]

Reverted pull request as it did not consider swapping two consecutive data with same size