[bug]: 0.19.1 filling logs with: [WRN] GRDB: Channel=969519666583044097 not found in graph cache

[Dominion5254]

Background

After updating from 0.19.0 -> 0.19.1 the logs seem to be spamming the below warnings despite lncli getinfo showing "synced_to_graph": true,

025-06-12T10:44:12-06:00  2025-06-12 16:44:12.543 [WRN] GRDB: Channel=969519666583044097 not found in graph cache
2025-06-12T10:44:12-06:00  2025-06-12 16:44:12.543 [WRN] GRDB: Channel=969519666583044097 not found in graph cache
2025-06-12T10:44:32-06:00  2025-06-12 16:44:32.515 [WRN] GRDB: Channel=933411704926044160 not found in graph cache
2025-06-12T10:44:32-06:00  2025-06-12 16:44:32.516 [WRN] GRDB: Channel=933411704926044160 not found in graph cache
2025-06-12T10:44:43-06:00  2025-06-12 16:44:43.369 [WRN] GRDB: Channel=989992573135683585 not found in graph cache
2025-06-12T10:44:43-06:00  2025-06-12 16:44:43.369 [WRN] GRDB: Channel=989992573135683585 not found in graph cache

Is this expected to resolve with more time?

LND seems to otherwise be functioning normally.

Your environment

• version of lnd: 0.19.1
• which operating system (uname -a on *Nix): StartOS 0.3.5.1
• version of btcd, bitcoind, or other backend: bitcoind 28.1

Steps to reproduce

Update LND from 0.19.0 -> 0.19.1

Expected behaviour

Clean logs without these warnings when the graph should be fully synced

Actual behaviour

LND logs spamming warnings about channels missing from the graph cache

[wereHamster]

I don't think this is a new issue, I've seen this warning even before the upgrade from 0.19.0 to 0.19.1.

#9930.

[Dominion5254]

It is definitely possible this issue exists on 0.19.0 (which I admittedly hadn't used for very long before updating to 0.19.1); But I can't said I have seen this warning on LND <= 0.18.5.

[wereHamster]

The log was added in 0.19.0 (001e559). Though the problem likely existed before (just silent).

Is it possible that you were running with Neutrino backend initially and then switched to btcd / bitcoind backend?

[Dominion5254]

Nice find. I guess the question is whether LL intended for this additional logging.

I am not nor have ever run neutrino on this node.

[saubyk]

Converting this into a discussion thread instead