Skip to content

Just a Question #36

@daxgames

Description

@daxgames

@lfilho I am getting back to trying out your fork of skwp/dotfiles via my own fork of your work. I am looking at it more critically and that has generated some questions.

You seem to be using this repo as more of an all encompassing workstation setup vs. terminal configuration framework like skwp/dotfiles.

Would that be a fair assessment?

I ask this because the Brewfile seems to install A LOT of stuff that is not terminal related, or is the extra software somehow used by the nvim plugins.

It really does more than I want and was wondering if I remove most of the stuff from the Brewfile in my fork if I was going to break a bunch of stuff.

If I chose to modify the Brewfile and continued to use it on both MacOS and Linux what would be the bare minimum Brewfile without breaking things?

brew 'bat'
brew 'ctags'
brew 'neovim'
brew 'tmux'
brew 'zsh'

I included tmux above because I compile it on Linux and do not use the native package anyway.

I was even looking at the possibility of reverting to not even using brew unless it was on MacOS and leaving the Brewfile alone since I install most of that stuff on MacOS using brew already. I would probably just create a function in the Rakefile to install the nvim requirements if the OS were Linux.

I don't know, it just seems odd to me to use Homebrew on Linux instead of the native package managers that are already there. I'm not sure how I feel about how it creates a whole separate filesystem tree with stuff it installs and that I can end up with Firefox from both native package manager and Homebrew.

Am I over thinking this?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions