Summary
The container test runner's completion/status messaging is misleading in interactive single-distro sessions.
Problem
A command such as:
can report Test completed for distro: arch even though the session was intentionally interactive rather than a straightforward non-interactive success/fail test run. That phrasing overstates what actually happened.
Goal
Adjust test/containers/run-test messaging so interactive modes describe the session accurately.
Done looks like
- Interactive shell or debug-oriented runs no longer emit a misleading generic success/completion message.
- The final status text distinguishes between:
- non-interactive automated test completion
- interactive shell/debug sessions
- early-stop or partial-run modes
- The wording is clear for both single-distro and multi-distro runs.
Notes
This is a UX issue, but it matters because the current message can make a manual debugging session look like a completed automated validation.
Summary
The container test runner's completion/status messaging is misleading in interactive single-distro sessions.
Problem
A command such as:
can report
Test completed for distro: archeven though the session was intentionally interactive rather than a straightforward non-interactive success/fail test run. That phrasing overstates what actually happened.Goal
Adjust
test/containers/run-testmessaging so interactive modes describe the session accurately.Done looks like
Notes
This is a UX issue, but it matters because the current message can make a manual debugging session look like a completed automated validation.