Skip to content

Update docs to specify need for explicit resolvers #992

Open
@matthewpwatkins

Description

@matthewpwatkins

Hi. I just started using handlebars java yesterday. I could not get something simple like this to render:

var handlebars = new Handlebars.registerHelperMissing((context, options) -> {
  throw new RuntimeException(
    String.format("Unregistered helper name %s rendering %s.", options.helperName, options.fn.text()));
});

var myObj = new MyObject();
var myObj .setFirstName("Luke");
myObj .getRelationship().setName("father");

var template = handlebars.compileInline("{{ firstName }}, I am your {{ relationship.name }}.");
var res = template.apply(myObj);

Every time, it threw saying it couldn't find firstName. I tried using fluent named accessors, exposing the fields directly, etc but no change in the names or access would get it to work. I could get it working by passing in a map, but not a POJO.

After a lot of searching documentation where others said it should "just work" out of the box, I stumbled on a code sample of someone who was explicitly setting the resolvers of the context:

var context = Context.newBuilder(myObj)
  .resolvers(JavaBeanValueResolver.INSTANCE, FieldValueResolver.INSTANCE)
  .build();
var res = template.apply(context);

This works like a charm.

But why doesn't it work "out of the box?" Or can we update the docs to reflect that you need to specify the resolvers for java objects?

I'm using version 4.1.2.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions