Skip to content

Complex follow-ups #355

@seberg

Description

@seberg

There are a few (hopefully very small) follow-ups that I forgot to point out in the original PR. But maybe they are good as follow-ups anyway:

  • The docs don't mention the new dtypes yet!
  • The .imag/.real problem may need discussing? I suspect there isn't much to do except putting a big warning into the documentation, unfortunately.
  • I put some random characters in and forgot to think about it again. We need something better!
    • ideally the complex ones would be capitalized float ones (just for symmetry with NumPy). But, bfloat16 is E which would be the code for complex32.
    • I suppose we could actually use c kind code for complex32, but maybe not for bcomplex32.

I'll open a PR soon, but if anyone has thoughts (especially on the character codes) please say so (no need to look what they are now, they are truly random).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions