Skip to content

[Question]: Why not use minerU to parse the document? At least this option can be added? #8092

Open
@ljtihaveadream

Description

@ljtihaveadream

Self Checks

  • I have searched for existing issues search for existing issues, including closed ones.
  • I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (Language Policy).
  • Non-english title submitions will be closed directly ( 非英文标题的提交将会被直接关闭 ) (Language Policy).
  • Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.

Describe your problem

Using minerU to parse documents is clearly a relatively good choice. Although it is cut rather finely, we can merge it. We sincerely hope that the development team will incorporate this option to enable the project to truly leverage its advantages. What do you all think?###

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    💞 featureFeature request, pull request that fullfill a new feature.🙋‍♀️ questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions