My understanding is xTB and its dependencies are all LGPL 3.0 licensed, but it looks like this repo has the GPL 3.0 license. Is this intentional or should it also be LGPL? I think technically a binary without source code can't be distributed under the GPL 3.0, as it requires sharing the source with any distribution.
My understanding is xTB and its dependencies are all LGPL 3.0 licensed, but it looks like this repo has the GPL 3.0 license. Is this intentional or should it also be LGPL? I think technically a binary without source code can't be distributed under the GPL 3.0, as it requires sharing the source with any distribution.