Dear Google Conscrypt team, @flooey (who has added "tls-unique", a part of the RFC 5929),
Can you add the missing "tls-server-end-point" support of RFC 5929: Channel Bindings for TLS?
Recently, @simo5 explains why it is needed here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/-hhno2IUJQwXOyJT3-CTaKxoOuA/
Little details, to know easily:
- tls-unique for TLS =< 1.2 (RFC5929)
- tls-server-end-point =< 1.2 + 1.3 (RFC5929)
- tls-exporter for TLS = 1.3 (RFC9266)
After the jabber.ru MITM, it is time to add it:
Thanks in advance.
Linked to:
cc: @flooey, @andres-erbsen, @jake-scott, @Chrizpy, @mdosch.
Dear Google Conscrypt team, @flooey (who has added "tls-unique", a part of the RFC 5929),
Can you add the missing "tls-server-end-point" support of RFC 5929: Channel Bindings for TLS?
Recently, @simo5 explains why it is needed here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/kitten/-hhno2IUJQwXOyJT3-CTaKxoOuA/
Little details, to know easily:
After the jabber.ru MITM, it is time to add it:
Thanks in advance.
Linked to:
cc: @flooey, @andres-erbsen, @jake-scott, @Chrizpy, @mdosch.