[Issue Arborist] Issue Arborist Report — 2026-07-28 #1702
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been marked as outdated by Issue Arborist. A newer discussion is available at Discussion #1722. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🌳 Issue Arborist Report
Issues analyzed: 55
Parent issues created
None — no orphan cluster of 5+ unparented issues found. All clusters already had existing parent issues.
Links created (26 total)
Suggested (not linked — for maintainer review)
safe-outputs.threat-detection.promptis not supported #1701, [agent-issue]: Port gh-aw's set-issue-type safe output to ado-aw (native GitHub Issue Types) #1621, feat: align FrontMatter fields with gh-aw schema — run-name, labels, metadata, tracker-id, source, strict #451): Three issues tracking parity gaps with gh-aw (threat-detection prompt, set-issue-type safe output, FrontMatter field alignment). Only 3 issues — below the 5-issue threshold — but a[Parent] gh-aw schema and feature paritytracking issue could be useful if more parity items arise.chore(workflows): recompile safe-output fixturesissues. Routine housekeeping; no parent needed unless a pattern of blocking failures emerges.Observations
[aw]workflow failure issues (rate limits, bash hygiene auditor) are now properly routed to [Parent] Track and resolve recurring AI-credits rate-limit failures in scheduled agentic workflows #1535 and [Parent] Track and resolve recurring agentic workflow execution failures (non-rate-limit) #1549.All reactions