[daily performance] Daily Performance Summary - 2026-08-12 #52356
Closed
Replies: 1 comment
|
This discussion has been superseded by a newer daily performance report. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Performance Overview
The
github/gh-awrepository shows very high automation and development velocity in the most recent activity sample. Due to API pagination limits, this report is based on the 300 most recent PRs (spanning ~5 days back to 2026-08-07), the 300 most recent issues, and the 100 most recent discussions rather than a full 90-day window — actual 90-day totals are substantially larger. Within this recent window, merge and resolution velocity remain fast, with a high proportion of automated (bot-authored) activity typical of an agentic-workflow-heavy repository.Pull request throughput is strong: 216 of 300 sampled PRs (72%) are already merged, with an average merge time of just 3.4 hours — indicating rapid review/merge cycles, likely aided by automated agents. Issue resolution is similarly fast, averaging 9.3 hours to close, though a notable share (110 of 300, ~37%) remain open, consistent with a busy backlog of bot-filed workflow-failure issues.
Discussion engagement in the recent sample shows 0 of 100 discussions formally marked "answered," which may reflect that many recent discussions (e.g., automated prompt-analysis or performance reports) are informational rather than Q&A-style threads not requiring a marked answer.
Key Highlights
🚨 Critical Performance Issues
No critical performance issues detected. Note the data-completeness caveat above: due to GitHub API
first/pagination limits enforced by the query tools (PR/issue query capped at 300 records, discussion query capped at 100), this report reflects only the most recent slice of activity rather than the full 90-day period. Historical trend comparison against prior daily reports is recommended to track longer-term velocity.📈 Activity Overview
Pull requests and issues each account for 300 sampled records, while discussions are capped at 100 due to API limits. This reflects gh-aw's very high issue/PR volume relative to discussion activity, driven substantially by automated agentic workflows filing issues and PRs.
📊 Detailed Benchmark Results
🎯 Resolution Metrics
72% of sampled PRs are merged versus 6% still open (remainder closed unmerged), showing healthy PR throughput. For issues, 63.3% are closed versus 36.7% open, suggesting a moderately sized active backlog, common for a repo generating many automated workflow-failure issues.
⚡ Velocity Metrics
Merge and close times are both under 10 hours on average, indicating fast turnaround. Only 6 unique human/bot authors appear in the recent PR sample, and 0% of sampled discussions are marked answered.
📊 Complete Performance Data
Pull Requests
Issues
Discussions
📈 Historical Comparisons
The previous daily performance report (2026-08-11, discussion #52149) has been closed as outdated in favor of this report. Direct numeric comparison is limited this run because both reports sample only the most recent records rather than a fixed 90-day window; consider extending the underlying query tools to support true date-range filtering for more reliable trend comparisons going forward.
💡 Optimization Recommendations
github-pr-query/github-issue-queryto support server-side date filtering (e.g.,since) so reports can reliably cover a true 90-day window instead of a fixed record count.[aw] Failed jobsissues) — consider auto-closing or de-duplicating recurring automated failure issues.Report generated automatically by the Daily Performance Summary workflow
Data source: github/gh-aw - Most recent available sample (PRs/issues: 300 records, discussions: 100 records) due to API pagination limits
Powered by Safe-Input Tools - GitHub queries exposed as MCP tools
All reactions