Skip to content

Commit 7188659

Browse files
committed
We had to move to Codeberg
1 parent c0f49c5 commit 7188659

File tree

2 files changed

+9
-0
lines changed

2 files changed

+9
-0
lines changed

CMakeLists.txt

Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ set(CMAKE_USE_RELATIVE_PATHS TRUE)
44
project("TestAbs")
55
set("PROJECT_DESCRIPTION" "An abstraction layer around C++ testing frameworks")
66
set("PROJECT_HOMEPAGE_URL" "https://github.com/KAbs/${PROJECT_NAME}.cpp")
7+
message(STATUS "We have moved from M$ GitHub to ${PROJECT_HOMEPAGE_URL}, read why on https://codeberg.org/KOLANICH/Fuck-GuanTEEnomo . ")
78

89
set(CPACK_PACKAGE_VENDOR "KOLANICH")
910
set(CPACK_PACKAGE_VERSION_MAJOR "0")

ReadMe.md

Lines changed: 8 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,14 @@
11
TestAbs - a test framework abstraction layer
22
============================================
33

4+
**We have moved to https://codeberg.org/KFmts/TestAbs.cpp (the namespace has been changed to `KAbs`, which groups packages related to ahstraction layers), grab new versions there.**
5+
6+
Under the disguise of "better security" Micro$oft-owned GitHub has [discriminated users of 1FA passwords](https://github.blog/2023-03-09-raising-the-bar-for-software-security-github-2fa-begins-march-13/) while having commercial interest in success and wide adoption of [FIDO 1FA specifications](https://fidoalliance.org/specifications/download/) and [Windows Hello implementation](https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/passkeys-in-windows-301c8944-5ea2-452b-9886-97e4d2ef4422) which [it promotes as a replacement for passwords](https://github.blog/2023-07-12-introducing-passwordless-authentication-on-github-com/). It will result in dire consequencies and is competely inacceptable, [read why](https://codeberg.org/KOLANICH/Fuck-GuanTEEnomo).
7+
8+
If you don't want to participate in harming yourself, it is recommended to follow the lead and migrate somewhere away of GitHub and Micro$oft. Here is [the list of alternatives and rationales to do it](https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/49869). If they delete the discussion, there are certain well-known places where you can get a copy of it. [Read why you should also leave GitHub](https://codeberg.org/KOLANICH/Fuck-GuanTEEnomo).
9+
10+
---
11+
412
Provides a very limited interface for the ones who want to reuse test frameworks machineries in own higher level testing solutions.
513

614
Testing frameworks all have own good and bad sides.

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)