Skip to content

Misleading information regarding licensing #5199

Open
@prassanna-ravishankar

Description

@prassanna-ravishankar

📚 Documentation

The documentation is slightly misleading regarding licensing. The root licenses says all pre-trained models are covered by MIT license, however, the individual model tutorials have a different license (for example, this one has a CC-by-NA - https://github.com/facebookresearch/fairseq/blob/main/examples/mms/README.md#license)

Could we get a clarification on which one is the correct license? I can go ahead and make a PR once clarified.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions