Skip to content

[codex] Move tx history backfill commits#85

Closed
devanoneth wants to merge 23 commits into
eternalsafefrom
codex/tx-history-backfill
Closed

[codex] Move tx history backfill commits#85
devanoneth wants to merge 23 commits into
eternalsafefrom
codex/tx-history-backfill

Conversation

@devanoneth

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Moves the transaction history backfill work off the eternalsafe branch into a dedicated feature branch.

This PR contains the 19 commits that were local-only on eternalsafe, covering tx history query settings, cursor persistence and hydration hardening, bounded parallel log backfill helpers, resumable backfill loading, and the final tx history backfill UI.

Validation

  • Fetched remotes and compared origin/eternalsafe...HEAD before moving commits.
  • Preserved the commit set on codex/tx-history-backfill.
  • Reset local eternalsafe back to origin/eternalsafe after preserving the branch.

No code tests were run because this task only moved existing commits between branches.

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
wallet Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 27, 2026 0:51am

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage report

St.
Category Percentage Covered / Total
🟡 Statements
75.97% (+0.61% 🔼)
8082/10638
🔴 Branches
54.62% (+0.72% 🔼)
2008/3676
🔴 Functions
59.46% (+1.49% 🔼)
1197/2013
🟡 Lines
77.78% (+0.5% 🔼)
7280/9360
Show new covered files 🐣
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢
... / types.ts
100% 100% 100% 100%
🟢
... / historicalRpcSyncSlice.ts
96.55% 84.62% 100% 100%
🟢
... / useLoadTxHistory.ts
82.35% 100% 100% 85.71%
🟢
... / useTxHistoryLoader.ts
83.67% 67.47% 95.56% 82.99%
🟢
... / queryFilterBackfill.ts
97.06% 50% 100% 96.77%
🟢
... / useLoadableStores.ts
100% 61.54% 100% 100%
🟢
... / index.tsx
82.46% 57.69% 46.15% 82.14%
🟢
... / useTxHistory.ts
82.35% 71.43% 100% 83.87%
🟢
... / index.tsx
100% 72.73% 100% 100%
Show files with reduced coverage 🔻
St.
File Statements Branches Functions Lines
🟢 src/store/index.ts
98.31% (+2.01% 🔼)
66.67% (-33.33% 🔻)
100% 100%
🟢
... / txHistorySlice.ts
91.67% (+0.49% 🔼)
76.92% (-4.9% 🔻)
85.71% (+5.71% 🔼)
93.33% (+0.23% 🔼)
🟢
... / index.tsx
82.35% (-8.82% 🔻)
66.67% (-16.67% 🔻)
50% (-12.5% 🔻)
83.87% (-9.68% 🔻)

Test suite run success

933 tests passing in 168 suites.

Report generated by 🧪jest coverage report action from 23bdc28

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Apr 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

📦 Next.js Bundle Analysis for eternalsafe-wallet

This analysis was generated by the Next.js Bundle Analysis action. 🤖

⚠️ Global Bundle Size Increased

Page Size (compressed)
global 1.14 MB (🟡 +3.32 KB)
Details

The global bundle is the javascript bundle that loads alongside every page. It is in its own category because its impact is much higher - an increase to its size means that every page on your website loads slower, and a decrease means every page loads faster.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

If you want further insight into what is behind the changes, give @next/bundle-analyzer a try!

Four Pages Changed Size

The following pages changed size from the code in this PR compared to its base branch:

Page Size (compressed) First Load
/settings/environment-variables 4.94 KB (🟡 +255 B) 1.15 MB
/transactions 44.98 KB (🟡 +325 B) 1.19 MB
/transactions/history 44.96 KB (🟡 +327 B) 1.19 MB
/transactions/queue 44.97 KB (🟡 +330 B) 1.19 MB
Details

Only the gzipped size is provided here based on an expert tip.

First Load is the size of the global bundle plus the bundle for the individual page. If a user were to show up to your website and land on a given page, the first load size represents the amount of javascript that user would need to download. If next/link is used, subsequent page loads would only need to download that page's bundle (the number in the "Size" column), since the global bundle has already been downloaded.

Any third party scripts you have added directly to your app using the <script> tag are not accounted for in this analysis

Next to the size is how much the size has increased or decreased compared with the base branch of this PR. If this percentage has increased by 20% or more, there will be a red status indicator applied, indicating that special attention should be given to this.

@devanoneth devanoneth marked this pull request as ready for review April 27, 2026 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant