Skip to content

Conversation

@boegel
Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel commented Nov 21, 2025

(created using eb --new-pr)

@boegel boegel added the new label Nov 21, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the 2025a issues & PRs related to 2025a common toolchains label Nov 21, 2025
@boegel boegel added this to the next release (5.2.0?) milestone Nov 21, 2025
@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 21, 2025

@boegelbot please test @ jsc-zen3

@boegel
Copy link
Member Author

boegel commented Nov 21, 2025

Test report by @boegel
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 20 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
node4226.shinx.os - Linux RHEL 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC 9654 96-Core Processor (zen4), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegel/915597cf0e651166936fee6545a5ebe5 for a full test report.

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

@boegel: Request for testing this PR well received on jsczen3l1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de

PR test command 'if [[ develop != 'develop' ]]; then EB_BRANCH=develop ./easybuild_develop.sh 2> /dev/null 1>&2; EB_PREFIX=/home/boegelbot/easybuild/develop source init_env_easybuild_develop.sh; fi; EB_PR=24657 EB_ARGS= EB_CONTAINER= EB_REPO=easybuild-easyconfigs EB_BRANCH=develop /opt/software/slurm/bin/sbatch --job-name test_PR_24657 --ntasks=8 ~/boegelbot/eb_from_pr_upload_jsc-zen3.sh' executed!

  • exit code: 0
  • output:
Submitted batch job 8878

Test results coming soon (I hope)...

- notification for comment with ID 3564967584 processed

Message to humans: this is just bookkeeping information for me,
it is of no use to you (unless you think I have a bug, which I don't).

@boegelbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test report by @boegelbot
SUCCESS
Build succeeded for 1 out of 1 (total: 1 min 28 secs) (1 easyconfigs in total)
jsczen3c1.int.jsc-zen3.fz-juelich.de - Linux Rocky Linux 9.6, x86_64, AMD EPYC-Milan Processor (zen3), Python 3.9.21
See https://gist.github.com/boegelbot/883b1a9a8a1deeed196b1c5fcae80c26 for a full test report.

('Python', '3.13.1'),
('SciPy-bundle', '2025.06'),
('Biopython', '1.85'),
('Cython', '3.1.1'),
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

shouldn't this be a build dep?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good point, but pip check will fail if it's not listed as a dependency, since it's listed in requirements.txt

We can get rid of it (via preinstallopts) of course.

I'll open an issue upstream to ask...

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

2025a issues & PRs related to 2025a common toolchains new

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants