v4.0.0 #899
Replies: 2 comments 3 replies
|
First of all, thank you for all the work that went into this release. The 3D view combined with shaded relief looks absolutely beautiful! Also I love that the tracks follow the terrain model. Great work! After spinning up a fresh 4.0 instance I noticed network traffic is on the higher side. I think the main reasons are:
On a related note, I noticed the tile cache proxies sources that require visible attribution. In particular OpenStreetMap (ODbL, legally required), Esri World Imagery (required by their ToS; see https://doc.arcgis.com/en/arcgis-online/reference/display-copyrights.htm and https://www.arcgis.com/apps/mapviewer/index.html?layers=10df2279f9684e4a9f6a7f08febac2a9) and probably also Mapterhorn. Maybe I just missed it, but neither appears to be credited in the map UI currently. Probably worth addressing before this gets wider adoption. That said, I would also love to be able to configure the tile sources. e.g. being able to replace the satellite tiles with a custom one or also for the osm basemap. Still waiting for my > two million points to import but so far it looks perfect and I probably will be able to give some more feedback soon :) |
|
Just migrated to 4.0, so far so good! A stunning update - thankyou! |

Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
This is a discussion to share your thoughts and feedback on the v4.0.0 release.
All reactions