During the damage simulation, no damage result was output，My yaml file is as follows

[TAIYONGZOU]

homogenization:
SX:
N_constituents: 1
mechanical:
type: pass
damage:
type: pass
initialDamage: 1.0
output: damage
porosity: phasefield
output: porosity

phase:
Aluminum:
lattice: cF
mechanical:
output: [F, P, F_e, F_p, L_p, O]
elastic: {type: Hooke, C_11: 107e9, C_12: 52e9, C_44: 26e9}
plastic:
type: dislotwin
output: [rho_dip, rho_mob]
D: 1.525e-05
tau_0: [55e6]
N_sl: [12]
b_sl: [2.546e-10]
rho_dip_0: [1]
rho_mob_0: [1e12]
v_0: [10e-5]
Q_sl: [8.361e-20]
Q_cl: 1.876e-19
p_sl: [0.8]
q_sl: [1.5]
i_sl: [45]
V_at: 6.6e-29
D_a: 7
D_0: 0.000623
h_sl-sl: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
damage:
- type: anisobrittle
output: [f_phi]
W_crit: 500000.0
N_cl: [3]
g_crit: [0.5e+7]
s_crit: [0.006666]
dot_o: 1.e-3
l_c: 1.0
q: 20
mu: 0.001

material:

• constituents:
  • O: [0.8824265782080677, -0.05608753307113829, 0.08883322634416188, -0.45856971182502]
    phase: Aluminum
    v: 1.0
    homogenization: SX
• constituents:
  • O: [0.6134475557126102, 0.6543253967799157, 0.2798496271731801, -0.34238072038311673]
    phase: Aluminum
    v: 1.0
    homogenization: SX
• constituents:
  • O: [0.7230577269230365, -0.5061658616635942, -0.4606239451877223, -0.09385747249388812]
    phase: Aluminum
    v: 1.0
    homogenization: SX
• constituents:
  • O: [0.13098834197947687, -0.9552127374211582, 0.12172171101201634, 0.23578487144461188]
    phase: Aluminum
    v: 1.0
    homogenization: SX
• constituents:
  • O: [0.7651127176405781, 0.3814195211793133, -0.4439972574587404, -0.26830600726988824]
    phase: Aluminum
    v: 1.0
    homogenization: SX

[hyharry]

Did you forget to set a solver for your damage field? Normally you can do that along with your mechanical solver like this in your load.yaml file.

solver: {mechanical: spectral_basic, damage: spectral}

[TAIYONGZOU]

Thank you! In my results only the damage driving force (f_phi) is output, but there is no damage (phi) output.Is this because my material.yaml file settings are wrong？

…

---- Replied Message ---- | From | ***@***.***> | | Date | 4/4/2024 22:26 | | To | ***@***.***> | | Cc | ***@***.***>, ***@***.***> | | Subject | Re: [eisenforschung/DAMASK] During the damage simulation, no damage result was output，My yaml file is as follows (Discussion #9) | Did you forget to set a solver for your damage field? Normally you can do that along with your mechanical solver like this in your load.yaml file. solver: {mechanical: spectral_basic, damage: spectral} — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[hyharry]

@TAIYONGZOU Hello, if you think my answer solves your problem, please mark my reply as answer. This will also help the others.

[hyharry]

if you are using the official damask3, you can specify damage output in the homogenization block of your material.yaml, e.g.

homogenization:
  SX:
    N_constituents: 1
    mechanical: {type: pass}
    damage:
      output: [phi]
      type: pass

[TAIYONGZOU]

I really appreciate your help！

…

---- Replied Message ---- | From | ***@***.***> | | Date | 4/5/2024 21:13 | | To | ***@***.***> | | Cc | ***@***.***>, ***@***.***> | | Subject | Re: [eisenforschung/DAMASK] During the damage simulation, no damage result was output，My yaml file is as follows (Discussion #9) | @TAIYONGZOU Hello, if you think my answer solves your problem, please mark my reply as answer. This will also help the others. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[TAIYONGZOU]

Dear DAMASK team： I want to simulate phase field damage, how should I set up the material.yaml file?

…

---- Replied Message ---- | From | ***@***.***> | | Date | 4/4/2024 22:26 | | To | ***@***.***> | | Cc | ***@***.***>, ***@***.***> | | Subject | Re: [eisenforschung/DAMASK] During the damage simulation, no damage result was output，My yaml file is as follows (Discussion #9) | Did you forget to set a solver for your damage field? Normally you can do that along with your mechanical solver like this in your load.yaml file. solver: {mechanical: spectral_basic, damage: spectral} — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[hyharry]

The damage simulation in DAMASK is already a phase-field formulation. Pls refer to the DAMASK paper.

[TAIYONGZOU]

I got it！ Thank you

…

---- Replied Message ---- | From | ***@***.***> | | Date | 4/8/2024 17:31 | | To | ***@***.***> | | Cc | ***@***.***>, ***@***.***> | | Subject | Re: [eisenforschung/DAMASK] During the damage simulation, no damage result was output，My yaml file is as follows (Discussion #9) | The damage simulation in DAMASK is already a phase-field formulation. Pls refer to the DAMASK paper. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>