Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
These are still important for folks who build frameworks over Dagster, e.g. a user who has built their own DSL for building dependency graphs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
|
We could do work to de-emphasize them and cast them as "advanced" APIs, but we need to maintain backwards compatibility. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
This would entail removing
SolidDefinitionin favor of@solid,PipelineDefinitionandDependencyDefinitionin favor of@pipeline,ResourceDefinitionin favor of@resource,LoggerDefinitionin favor of@logger,RepositoryDefinitionin favor of@repository, andScheduleDefinitionin favor of@schedule. The goal here is to reduce the user-facing API documentation/tutorial surface & to avoid presenting what is in effect a false choice (since the decorator APIs are equally powerful and to be preferred in every case of which we're aware).We would deprecate in 0.10.0 and remove in 0.11.0.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions