Long dashed-through text is not rendered correctly

[FArekkusu]

Comment preview:

Actual comment:

┆Issue is synchronized with this Clickup by Unito

[kazk]

This is another inconsistency between the client side and the server side Markdown libraries. Next time, please include the Markdown as well.

~Note: the reference solution stores intermediate results to avoid recomputing the whole thing on each function call. With this approach (used both in reference and user's solution) it is possible to generate values in range `[120; 150]` and pass 20 tests in ~5 seconds. If I were to replace both the reference and the user's solution with an `O(n^5)` algorithm, the input range would have to be lowered to `[70; 100]`, and even then it would barely avoid timing out. What do you think about this? Should Python version expect the user to use memoization? Should the input range be lowered to make the Python version "equivalent" to the JavaScript version? Should the translation not be approved at all?~

On GitHub:

~Note: the reference solution stores intermediate results to avoid recomputing the whole thing on each function call. With this approach (used both in reference and user's solution) it is possible to generate values in range [120; 150] and pass 20 tests in 5 seconds. If I were to replace both the reference and the user's solution with an O(n^5) algorithm, the input range would have to be lowered to [70; 100], and even then it would barely avoid timing out. What do you think about this? Should Python version expect the user to use memoization? Should the input range be lowered to make the Python version "equivalent" to the JavaScript version? Should the translation not be approved at all?

So, I think the preview (client side) is wrong.

You need to escape the ~ in ~5 seconds with a backslash: \~5 seconds.

Note: the reference solution stores intermediate results to avoid recomputing the whole thing on each function call. With this approach (used both in reference and user's solution) it is possible to generate values in range [120; 150] and pass 20 tests in ~5 seconds. If I were to replace both the reference and the user's solution with an O(n^5) algorithm, the input range would have to be lowered to [70; 100], and even then it would barely avoid timing out. What do you think about this? Should Python version expect the user to use memoization? Should the input range be lowered to make the Python version "equivalent" to the JavaScript version? Should the translation not be approved at all?