Has anyone used CORE as part of continuous integration for dataset creation? #1621
billdenney
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
If this is what you mean ... Well, we have integrated CORE in our SDTM-ETL mapping tool: the user can execute CORE any time on the (draft/temporary) datasets, even when mapping is not complete yet. As an option, the user can do rule selections based on e.g. organization (FDA/CDISC), SDTM class, etc, down to selecting individual rules. Also the rules derived from the "SDTM dataset specializations" have been implemented, and the user can also select their own, internal rules. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
There is a discussion on the
pharmaverseslack right now about how open tools can be used for continuous integration for SDTM (and ADaM and ...) data checking. I found a Dockerfile for CORE within the repo (https://github.com/cdisc-org/cdisc-rules-engine/blob/f70881313531a7f489e8e7094e8268d0df2c3814/dockerfile) that suggests that someone may have some experience with similar work or perhaps something along those lines.So, has anyone done used CORE in continuous integration of dataset creation? (My personal use case is with a self-hosted GitLab instance.)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions