Add circumvent for zero-variadic macros - solve #43 #54
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Author
|
Hi @pdimov , I have doubts about describing circumvents in the main doc, so if you find the solution itself good enough, I guess it could be delivered as a hidden feature with instructions only in gh issue |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It would be nice to resolve this issue, since there are many areas where standards require overly strict rules like
-Wgnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments, and the preprocessor is not easily isolated for suppression.This fix is based on:
voidfor types with empty bases, highly frequent usecase_EMPTYmember macros, ugly (exposing few internals as library API), but functional.