Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
60 lines (49 loc) · 5.04 KB

File metadata and controls

60 lines (49 loc) · 5.04 KB

Carrier comparison for the constructed whole-space endpoint

The public theorem Navier.Breakdown.ConstructedBreakdown.wholeSpaceBreakdown has the original type Navier.ProblemStatements.WholeSpaceBreakdown. The construction, comparison argument, coordinate transport, and viscosity scaling supply its proof without an additional analytic premise.

This review checks the connection between the formal carrier and the clauses in Fefferman’s official problem. It is an internal formalization review, not an external referee report or an assessment of eligibility for a prize.

Clause Evidence in this repository
Every positive viscosity ViscosityEndpoints.wholeSpaceBreakdown_iff_atViscosityOne and the explicit scaled construction in ConstructedForceExtension
Smooth divergence-free rapidly decaying initial data The construction starts with the zero Schwartz velocity; its scaled datum remains admissible
Smooth force, including time zero ConstructedForceExtension.selected_compact_candidate_contDiff extracts global smoothness from the actual selected construction, then proves localization, coordinate transport, and viscosity scaling preserve it
Smooth extension across the initial boundary constructedWholeSpaceBreakdownWithGloballySmoothForce supplies the globally defined force itself as an explicit HalfSpaceSmoothExtension; it does not assume Seeley’s theorem
All weighted derivative bounds Compact spatial and future-time support imply ForcedDataRapidDecay; OfficialCDEncoding transports the bounds to Euclidean coordinate weights
Successive mixed partials ForceRecursivePartials.successivePartialWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin identifies genuine recursive differentiation with jet evaluation, while ForceCoordinateEquivalence.forcedDataRapidDecay_iff_successivePartials proves the full force predicate is equivalent to smoothness plus decay for every ordered coordinate family
Original differential equation EuclideanPDETransport proves the time derivative, spatial derivative, divergence, convection, Laplacian, and pressure-gradient identities on the faithful native and Euclidean carriers
Finite and uniformly bounded energy Integrability is explicit, so Lean’s totalized integral cannot make this clause vacuous; the coordinate isometry and Euclidean energy comparison transport the original energy requirement
Every hypothetical global competitor ComparatorBridge.compact_candidate_unique_on_Icc proves agreement on each closed pre-singular slab from slab-local smoothness, finite energy, divergence, PDE and initial data, without assuming compact support or pressure decay of the competitor
No globally smooth bounded-energy solution ConstructedFiniteTimeObstruction.selected_candidate_finite_time_profile packages the same finite-energy witness with fixed compact support and proves that no continuous extension through time one can agree there
Stronger terminal obstruction selected_candidate_excludes_locally_finite_energy_continuation rules out a same-force competitor that is smooth before time one, continuous through it on the compact support, and finite-energy separately on every closed pre-singular slab; it does not assume one bound uniform as T → 1

Boundary conventions

The native PDE uses the right-within derivative at t = 0. On positive time this agrees with ordinary differentiation. For the selected force, the proved global smooth extension also supplies the stronger two-sided interpretation at the initial boundary.

The force estimates quantify over every ordered family of coordinate directions. Consequently they bound any prescribed ordering of ∂x^α ∂t^m; they do not need a theorem that arbitrary multilinear maps are symmetric. The earlier order-sensitive multilinear counterexample remains valid, but does not obstruct these actual-derivative estimates.

The converse finite-dimensional estimate is explicit: uniform scalar control of the four time/spatial coordinate directions at order n bounds the complete Fréchet operator norm by the cardinality of the word space, 4^n.

For hypothetical solutions, an extension-based reading of smoothness on the closed half-space implies the within-smooth predicate that the endpoint excludes. The exclusion therefore does not require the converse general half-space extension theorem.

Trust and scope

Fresh source compilation and raw fully qualified #print axioms for the selected candidate, comparison, global-force extension, recursive partials, and original C endpoint report only propext, Classical.choice, and Quot.sound. scripts/verify_construction.py rebuilds the source closure and repeats the endpoint audit with fingerprinted receipts.

The analytical construction is adapted from OpenAI’s pinned source, with license and modification notices retained. The result is forced whole-space alternative C. This native endpoint does not establish periodic D, unforced A/B, or uniqueness of a non-smooth continuation after the singular time.