Cheers 🍻
#15934
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Thanks. That's very appreciated. I was nervous about the formatting changes because I know they cause churn for all users and I'm glad to hear that you perceived them as improvements. Cheers |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
dependabot just upgraded ruff from 0.8.4 to 0.9.4 on a pretty large project I work on. CI failed, with ruff saying it would reformat about 30 files (out of 3000). With many people actively working on various PRs, I sighed, anticipating conflicts I'd have to review and fix manually.
I usually don't like it when formatters change their rules - it often just creates extra work. And to be honest, I rarely expect ruff to change much, because I think it's already so good. But this time, I ran the formatter locally and saw that the changes were, in fact, an evolution. Many of them were improvements I would have made manually if I had encountered those lines myself.
So huge thanks to you all for making a tool that is not only great but keeps getting even better!
Cheers 🍻
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions