Description
The README currently says that the default value of RELEASE_NAME is the empty string (""), however I don't think that this is the case.
I've recently used git-release with the first example workflow suggested here, and the title of the generated release was the tag itself.
For the avoidance of doubt - I like it that it uses the tag, it's just that I think the documentation for the RELEASE_NAME env var should be updated to reflect this behavior.
Side note: will you enable discussions in this repository? I would have preferred to create a discussion rather than an issue.
Reference
Description
The README currently says that the default value of
RELEASE_NAMEis the empty string (""), however I don't think that this is the case.I've recently used
git-releasewith the first example workflow suggested here, and the title of the generated release was the tag itself.For the avoidance of doubt - I like it that it uses the tag, it's just that I think the documentation for the
RELEASE_NAMEenv var should be updated to reflect this behavior.Side note: will you enable discussions in this repository? I would have preferred to create a discussion rather than an issue.
Reference