Doubt v0.3.1 — evidence maps readers can test #6
alsoleg89
announced in
Announcements
Replies: 1 comment
Update: zero-install playground is liveYou can now validate and render a Doubt map without npm or an agent: https://alsoleg89.github.io/doubt/playground/
The browser imports the same evidence-contract module used by the CLI, Action, The public Agent Skills vs MCP example produces receipt If you can make the playground accept a structurally misleading map, please |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Update:
v0.3.1is now the latest release. It fixes remote GitHub CLIdiscovery and has been tested end to end against the public repository:
The clean test selected
v0.3.1, discovered all four skill files, and installedthem with source/ref tracking.
v0.3.0had the project-level.github/skills/doubtlayout but not the separateskills/doubtpublisherlayout required by remote
gh skill; the patch adds it and CI now byte-checksboth layouts against the canonical skill.
The main v0.3 launch remains the reader-testable evidence-map loop:
Explore the Agent Skills vs MCP map
and challenge one edge in the review issue.
Take the five-topic map-vs-memo study.
It runs locally, sends nothing over the network, and downloads an anonymous
result JSON. Condition-level analysis stays locked until ten complete unique
sessions.
Install the workflow with the verified command above, or use:
The structural contract benchmark is 12/12, but that establishes structural
traceability and safe rendering—not source truth, faithful AI extraction, or
reader preference. The new study exists because those claims require evidence.
Latest release and tarball
If you try one thing, take the reader study. If an edge looks wrong, comment on
issue #5 with the exact source region that changes it.
All reactions