Skip to content

Commit 6cb291c

Browse files
committed
Fix title
1 parent 4e2447e commit 6cb291c

File tree

1 file changed

+11
-12
lines changed

1 file changed

+11
-12
lines changed

sections/3_societal_impact/uptake_in_medical_practice.qmd

Lines changed: 11 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -10,12 +10,11 @@ affiliations:
1010
name: Athena Research Center
1111
city: Athena
1212
country: Greece
13-
---
14-
1513

1614
title: Uptake in medical practice
15+
---
1716

18-
::: {}
17+
<div>
1918

2019
# History
2120

@@ -25,11 +24,11 @@ title: Uptake in medical practice
2524
| 1.1 | 2024-03-29 | Review | Tommaso Venturini |
2625
| 1.0 | 2024-03-22 | First draft | Petros Stavropoulos |
2726

28-
:::
27+
</div>
2928

3029
# Description
3130

32-
This indicator aims to capture the extent to which Open Science (OS) inputs such as code, data, and OA publications are integrated into medical practice, as evidenced by their mentions or references in medical guidelines and clinical trials.
31+
This indicator aims to capture the extent to which Open Science (OS) inputs such as code, data, and OA publications are integrated into medical practice, as evidenced by their mentions or references in medical guidelines and clinical trials.
3332

3433
A clinical trial is a research study that tests the safety and effectiveness of new medical interventions through structured phases involving participants who receive either the treatment or a placebo. In contrast, medical guidelines are comprehensive recommendations for healthcare providers, developed from a thorough review of existing evidence, including clinical trials, to standardize and improve patient care. While clinical trials generate new data about specific interventions, medical guidelines synthesize this data to offer evidence-based advice on best practices in clinical settings.
3534

@@ -51,7 +50,7 @@ Firstly, the variation in referencing styles across different guidelines can mak
5150

5251
**Methodology**:
5352

54-
**Step 1: Database Selection.** Choose databases that extensively []{#_Int_cDGukZbn}indexes medical guidelines, with PubMed being the primary source due to its wide coverage of biomedical literature.
53+
**Step 1: Database Selection.** Choose databases that extensively indexes medical guidelines, with PubMed being the primary source due to its wide coverage of biomedical literature.
5554

5655
**Step 2: Search Strategy Development.** Develop a search strategy with terms (or filters in the case of PubMed) related to medical guidelines and optionally combine them with keywords identifying datasets, or software. This strategy should be tailored to capture the broadest possible range of relevant references while minimizing irrelevant results.
5756

@@ -84,11 +83,11 @@ In steps:
8483

8584
To utilize ClinicalTrials.gov for the calculation of the metric:
8685

87-
1. Identify clinical trials mentioning OA resources using relevant keywords.
88-
2. Collect details on the use of OA publications, datasets, or software.
89-
3. Calculate the proportion of trials referencing OS inputs.
90-
4. Verify OA status using the OpenAIRE Research Graph.
91-
5. Manually validate data for accuracy.
86+
1. Identify clinical trials mentioning OA resources using relevant keywords.
87+
2. Collect details on the use of OA publications, datasets, or software.
88+
3. Calculate the proportion of trials referencing OS inputs.
89+
4. Verify OA status using the OpenAIRE Research Graph.
90+
5. Manually validate data for accuracy.
9291

9392
##### OpenAIRE Research Graph
9493

@@ -111,4 +110,4 @@ One limitation of this methodology is that it may not capture all instances of r
111110

112111
# References
113112

114-
Stavropoulos, P., Lyris, I., Manola, N., Grypari, I., & Papageorgiou, H. (2023). Empowering Knowledge Discovery from Scientific Literature: A novel approach to Research Artifact Analysis. In L. Tan, D. Milajevs, G. Chauhan, J. Gwinnup, & E. Rippeth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop for Natural Language Processing Open Source Software (NLP-OSS 2023) (pp. 37–53). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.nlposs-1.5
113+
Stavropoulos, P., Lyris, I., Manola, N., Grypari, I., & Papageorgiou, H. (2023). Empowering Knowledge Discovery from Scientific Literature: A novel approach to Research Artifact Analysis. In L. Tan, D. Milajevs, G. Chauhan, J. Gwinnup, & E. Rippeth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop for Natural Language Processing Open Source Software (NLP-OSS 2023) (pp. 37–53). Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.nlposs-1.5

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)