-
|
QNAP owner here. Having issues after installing -arr applications with sherpa on my QNAP server, where the /tmp folder is getting filled up entirely, reaching 100%. This leads to no longer being able to open the QNAP web interface and being stuck on the "Loading..." screen page, and also getting error messages running CLI commands. Only way to resolve is to reboot the server with CLI command, but a while after rebooting the applications will fill up the /tmp folder again. Running the sudo lsof /tmp/ command, it seems like the -arr applications are writing to the /tmp folder and filling it up. When I kill these screen processes for the applications, the web interfaces of the apps are no longer able to be reached. Example: Why are these processes being written to the /tmp folder? Can't they be written to another folder in the app qpkg folder instead? I never had this problem when using myqnap.org qpkgs, and these screen processes never show up when I run myqnap.org qpkgs of the -arr apps. However, the myqnap.org qpkgs have their own issues, which made me switch to sherpa in the first place. Seems I might have to switch back unfortunately. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 9 comments 16 replies
-
|
Hi @jonnypuma and thanks for reporting this. Can you please advise which files are filling up your Yes, if you kill a screen instance, the daemon running within that instance also gets killed. So, don't do that. 😉 Thank you. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Cheers mate, yes that helps. 👍🏽 So, it sounds like something is writing to a location it shouldn't. Based-on past experience, an application is either writing into $HOME for the internal To figure-out which application is causing this, please start only one of the suspected sherpa QPKGs, then monitor the filesystem usage at the specific locations mentioned above. I'll include commands so you can check the usage. These will give you a quick size summary. To examine the root filesystem (/) only: To examine $HOME for the Keep monitoring these locations. Does the total size used for one (or both) increase? If-not, please start the next suspected QPKG, and monitor again. As you can see, this is a slow process. It requires patient, methodical checks to narrow-down the culprit. When you've found the problem application, we can move onto the next step. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Let's try looking for files modified on the root filesystem (/) in the last 10 minutes: If nothing is shown, please extend that 10 minutes to 60 minutes and search again: Can you please paste back what you see? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Can you please also check the total of all the screen logs? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It appears the daemon logs are a lot more chatty in general operation than I thought (I don't actually use them myself in a production capacity). I'll move the location of each screen log into a path below each application installation. And ensure it's cleared on each QPKG start. And I'll post back when this is ready to go. 👍🏽 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I've now updated the QPKGs and released them into the Can you please switch to the When you've had a chance to check the space available on root (/) again after letting the QPKGs run for some time, please let me know if the issue is resolved. I'll then release the new QPKG versions into the Thank you. 🤓 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
That's great news, so I've now merged those packages into the To get you back on the You won't need to upgrade anything. With regard to Sonarr, yes that's the service script. If you run it with ... you'll be shown each previous run session for the application. Each one starts with a grey line, and concludes with a green line if the requested action was successful. If it concludes with a red line, something went wrong. You're looking for the last red line session in the log. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It looks like that message was written by the previous version of OSonarr QPKG. This recently changed and now the QPKG service script is called It then seems the next action shown is also a Let's proceed anyway. If you'd like to start OSonarr: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Starting a QPKG by the UI also enables it, so it shouldn't be that. If the QPKG was stopped via the UI (which also disables it), then the NAS rebooted, it's normal for QTS to try and start the QPKG even though it's disabled, which would generate that message. 👍🏽 I think you're all up-and-running now. Thanks again for reporting these issues, you've helped make the project better for everyone. If there are any other problems, please don't hesitate to mention them or ask for help. Cheers! 🤓 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
It appears the daemon logs are a lot more chatty in general operation than I thought (I don't actually use them myself in a production capacity).
I'll move the location of each screen log into a path below each application installation. And ensure it's cleared on each QPKG start.
And I'll post back when this is ready to go. 👍🏽