|
| 1 | +# Deployment Policy and Compartments |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +Deployment Policy provides fine-grained control over how Skyhook rolls out updates across your cluster by defining **compartments** — groups of nodes selected by labels — with different rollout strategies and budgets. |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +--- |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Overview |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +A **DeploymentPolicy** is a Kubernetes Custom Resource that separates rollout configuration from the Skyhook Custom Resource, allowing you to: |
| 10 | +- Reuse the same policy across multiple Skyhooks |
| 11 | +- Apply different strategies to different node groups (e.g., production vs. test) |
| 12 | +- Control rollout speed and safety with configurable thresholds |
| 13 | + |
| 14 | +--- |
| 15 | + |
| 16 | +## Basic Structure |
| 17 | + |
| 18 | +```yaml |
| 19 | +apiVersion: skyhook.nvidia.com/v1alpha1 |
| 20 | +kind: DeploymentPolicy |
| 21 | +metadata: |
| 22 | + name: my-policy |
| 23 | + namespace: skyhook |
| 24 | +spec: |
| 25 | + # Default applies to nodes that don't match any compartment |
| 26 | + default: |
| 27 | + budget: |
| 28 | + percent: 100 # or count: N |
| 29 | + strategy: |
| 30 | + fixed: # or linear, exponential |
| 31 | + initialBatch: 1 |
| 32 | + batchThreshold: 100 |
| 33 | + failureThreshold: 3 |
| 34 | + safetyLimit: 50 |
| 35 | + |
| 36 | + # Compartments define specific node groups |
| 37 | + compartments: |
| 38 | + - name: production |
| 39 | + selector: |
| 40 | + matchLabels: |
| 41 | + env: production |
| 42 | + budget: |
| 43 | + percent: 25 # Scales with cluster size |
| 44 | + strategy: |
| 45 | + exponential: |
| 46 | + initialBatch: 1 |
| 47 | + growthFactor: 2 |
| 48 | + batchThreshold: 100 |
| 49 | + failureThreshold: 1 |
| 50 | + safetyLimit: 50 |
| 51 | +``` |
| 52 | +
|
| 53 | +--- |
| 54 | +
|
| 55 | +## Core Concepts |
| 56 | +
|
| 57 | +### Compartments |
| 58 | +A named group of nodes selected by labels with: |
| 59 | +- **Selector**: Kubernetes `LabelSelector` to match nodes |
| 60 | +- **Budget**: Maximum nodes in progress at once (count or percent) |
| 61 | +- **Strategy**: Rollout pattern (fixed, linear, or exponential) |
| 62 | + |
| 63 | +### Budgets |
| 64 | +Defines the ceiling for concurrent nodes: |
| 65 | +- **Count**: Fixed number (e.g., `count: 3`) |
| 66 | +- **Percent**: Percentage of matched nodes (e.g., `percent: 25`) |
| 67 | + |
| 68 | +**Rounding for Percent**: `ceiling = max(1, int(matched_nodes × percent / 100))` |
| 69 | +- Always rounds **down** |
| 70 | +- Minimum is **1** (unless 0 nodes match) |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +**Examples**: |
| 73 | +| Matched Nodes | Percent | Ceiling | |
| 74 | +|---------------|---------|---------| |
| 75 | +| 10 | 25% | 2 | |
| 76 | +| 10 | 30% | 3 | |
| 77 | +| 5 | 10% | 1 (rounds down from 0.5, then max(1, 0)) | |
| 78 | +| 100 | 1% | 1 | |
| 79 | + |
| 80 | +--- |
| 81 | + |
| 82 | +## Rollout Strategies |
| 83 | + |
| 84 | +### Fixed Strategy |
| 85 | +Constant batch size throughout the rollout. |
| 86 | + |
| 87 | +```yaml |
| 88 | +strategy: |
| 89 | + fixed: |
| 90 | + initialBatch: 5 # Always process 5 nodes |
| 91 | + batchThreshold: 100 # Require 100% success |
| 92 | + failureThreshold: 3 # Stop after 3 consecutive failures |
| 93 | + safetyLimit: 50 # Apply failure threshold only below 50% progress |
| 94 | +``` |
| 95 | + |
| 96 | +**Use when**: You want predictable, safe rollouts. |
| 97 | + |
| 98 | +--- |
| 99 | + |
| 100 | +### Linear Strategy |
| 101 | +Increases by delta on success, decreases on failure. |
| 102 | + |
| 103 | +```yaml |
| 104 | +strategy: |
| 105 | + linear: |
| 106 | + initialBatch: 1 |
| 107 | + delta: 1 # Increase by 1 each success |
| 108 | + batchThreshold: 100 |
| 109 | + failureThreshold: 3 |
| 110 | + safetyLimit: 50 |
| 111 | +``` |
| 112 | + |
| 113 | +**Progression** (delta=1): `1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5` |
| 114 | + |
| 115 | +**Use when**: You want gradual ramp-up with slowdown on failures. |
| 116 | + |
| 117 | +--- |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | +### Exponential Strategy |
| 120 | +Multiplies by growth factor on success, divides on failure. |
| 121 | + |
| 122 | +```yaml |
| 123 | +strategy: |
| 124 | + exponential: |
| 125 | + initialBatch: 1 |
| 126 | + growthFactor: 2 # Double on success |
| 127 | + batchThreshold: 100 |
| 128 | + failureThreshold: 2 |
| 129 | + safetyLimit: 50 |
| 130 | +``` |
| 131 | + |
| 132 | +**Progression** (factor=2): `1 → 2 → 4 → 8 → 16` |
| 133 | + |
| 134 | +**Use when**: You want fast rollouts in large clusters with high confidence. |
| 135 | + |
| 136 | +--- |
| 137 | + |
| 138 | +## Strategy Parameters |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +All strategies share these parameters: |
| 141 | + |
| 142 | +- **`initialBatch`** (≥1): Starting number of nodes (default: 1) |
| 143 | +- **`batchThreshold`** (1-100): Minimum success percentage to continue (default: 100) |
| 144 | +- **`failureThreshold`** (≥1): Max consecutive failures before stopping (default: 3) |
| 145 | +- **`safetyLimit`** (1-100): Progress threshold for failure handling (default: 50) |
| 146 | + |
| 147 | +### Safety Limit Behavior |
| 148 | + |
| 149 | +**Before safetyLimit** (e.g., < 50% progress): |
| 150 | +- Failures count toward `failureThreshold` |
| 151 | +- Batch sizes slow down (linear/exponential) |
| 152 | +- Reaching `failureThreshold` stops the rollout |
| 153 | + |
| 154 | +**After safetyLimit** (e.g., ≥ 50% progress): |
| 155 | +- Rollout continues despite failures |
| 156 | +- Batch sizes don't slow down |
| 157 | +- Assumes rollout is "safe enough" to complete |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +**Rationale**: Early failures indicate a problem. Late failures are less critical since most nodes are updated. |
| 160 | + |
| 161 | +--- |
| 162 | + |
| 163 | +## Selectors and Node Matching |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +Compartments use standard Kubernetes label selectors: |
| 166 | + |
| 167 | +### Match Labels |
| 168 | +```yaml |
| 169 | +selector: |
| 170 | + matchLabels: |
| 171 | + env: production |
| 172 | + tier: frontend |
| 173 | +``` |
| 174 | + |
| 175 | +--- |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +## Overlapping Selectors |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +When a node matches **multiple compartments**, the operator uses a **safety heuristic** to choose the safest one. |
| 180 | + |
| 181 | +### Tie-Breaking Algorithm (3 levels) |
| 182 | + |
| 183 | +1. **Strategy Safety**: Prefer safer strategies |
| 184 | + - **Fixed** (safest) > **Linear** > **Exponential** (least safe) |
| 185 | + |
| 186 | +2. **Effective Ceiling**: If strategies are the same, prefer smaller ceiling |
| 187 | + - Smaller ceiling = fewer nodes at risk |
| 188 | + |
| 189 | +3. **Lexicographic**: If still tied, alphabetically by compartment name |
| 190 | + - Ensures deterministic behavior |
| 191 | + |
| 192 | +### Example |
| 193 | + |
| 194 | +```yaml |
| 195 | +compartments: |
| 196 | +- name: us-west |
| 197 | + selector: |
| 198 | + matchLabels: |
| 199 | + region: us-west |
| 200 | + budget: |
| 201 | + count: 20 # Ceiling = 20 |
| 202 | + strategy: |
| 203 | + exponential: {} |
| 204 | +
|
| 205 | +- name: production |
| 206 | + selector: |
| 207 | + matchLabels: |
| 208 | + env: production |
| 209 | + budget: |
| 210 | + count: 10 # Ceiling = 10 (smaller) |
| 211 | + strategy: |
| 212 | + linear: {} |
| 213 | +
|
| 214 | +- name: critical |
| 215 | + selector: |
| 216 | + matchLabels: |
| 217 | + priority: critical |
| 218 | + budget: |
| 219 | + count: 3 |
| 220 | + strategy: |
| 221 | + fixed: {} # Fixed (safest) |
| 222 | +``` |
| 223 | + |
| 224 | +**Node with labels** `region=us-west, env=production, priority=critical`: |
| 225 | +- Matches all three compartments |
| 226 | +- **Winner**: `critical` (fixed strategy is safest) |
| 227 | + |
| 228 | +**Node with labels** `region=us-west, env=production`: |
| 229 | +- Matches `us-west` (exponential) and `production` (linear) |
| 230 | +- **Winner**: `production` (linear is safer than exponential) |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +--- |
| 233 | + |
| 234 | +## Using with Skyhooks |
| 235 | + |
| 236 | +Reference a policy by name: |
| 237 | + |
| 238 | +```yaml |
| 239 | +apiVersion: skyhook.nvidia.com/v1alpha1 |
| 240 | +kind: Skyhook |
| 241 | +metadata: |
| 242 | + name: my-skyhook |
| 243 | +spec: |
| 244 | + deploymentPolicy: my-policy # References DeploymentPolicy |
| 245 | + nodeSelectors: |
| 246 | + matchLabels: |
| 247 | + workload: gpu |
| 248 | + packages: |
| 249 | + # ... |
| 250 | +``` |
| 251 | + |
| 252 | +**Behavior**: |
| 253 | +- DeploymentPolicy must be in the **same namespace** |
| 254 | +- Each node is assigned to a compartment based on selectors |
| 255 | +- Nodes not matching any compartment use the `default` settings |
| 256 | + |
| 257 | +--- |
| 258 | + |
| 259 | +## Migration from InterruptionBudget |
| 260 | + |
| 261 | +The legacy `interruptionBudget` field is still supported but **DeploymentPolicy is recommended**. |
| 262 | + |
| 263 | +### Before |
| 264 | +```yaml |
| 265 | +spec: |
| 266 | + interruptionBudget: |
| 267 | + percent: 25 |
| 268 | +``` |
| 269 | + |
| 270 | +### After |
| 271 | +```yaml |
| 272 | +# 1. Create DeploymentPolicy |
| 273 | +apiVersion: skyhook.nvidia.com/v1alpha1 |
| 274 | +kind: DeploymentPolicy |
| 275 | +metadata: |
| 276 | + name: legacy-equivalent |
| 277 | + namespace: skyhook |
| 278 | +spec: |
| 279 | + default: |
| 280 | + budget: |
| 281 | + percent: 25 |
| 282 | + strategy: |
| 283 | + fixed: |
| 284 | + initialBatch: 1 |
| 285 | + batchThreshold: 100 |
| 286 | + failureThreshold: 3 |
| 287 | + safetyLimit: 50 |
| 288 | +``` |
| 289 | + |
| 290 | +```yaml |
| 291 | +# 2. Update Skyhook |
| 292 | +spec: |
| 293 | + deploymentPolicy: legacy-equivalent |
| 294 | + # Remove interruptionBudget field |
| 295 | +``` |
| 296 | + |
| 297 | +--- |
| 298 | + |
| 299 | +## Monitoring |
| 300 | + |
| 301 | +Deployment Policy rollout behavior is exposed via Prometheus metrics. See [Metrics documentation](metrics/README.md) for details. |
| 302 | + |
| 303 | +--- |
| 304 | + |
| 305 | +## Examples |
| 306 | + |
| 307 | +See `/operator/config/samples/deploymentpolicy_v1alpha1_deploymentpolicy.yaml` for a complete sample showing: |
| 308 | +- Critical nodes (count=1, fixed strategy) |
| 309 | +- Production nodes (count=3, linear strategy) |
| 310 | +- Staging nodes (percent=33, exponential strategy) |
| 311 | +- Test nodes (percent=50, fast exponential) |
| 312 | + |
| 313 | +--- |
| 314 | + |
0 commit comments